

The 2025 Eaton Fire devastated Altadena and surrounding communities across Los Angeles County, destroying over 9,400 structures and claiming 19 lives.
Deadline alert: Personal injury and wrongful death claims from the Eaton Fire may face a filing deadline as early as January 7, 2027. Property damage claims may face a deadline as early as January 7, 2028. Call (310) 207-3233 or contact us today for a free, confidential case evaluation.
Wisner Baum attorneys filed an Eaton Fire lawsuit against SCE on January 28, 2025. The complaint alleges that SCE equipment sparked the fire and that the utility is responsible for the widespread destruction.
In an interview with Los Angeles radio station KNX 1070, Wisner Baum’s lead wildfire lawyer, Ari Friedman, said his firm “feels very confident that Edison’s equipment is to blame for the Eaton Fire.”
In August 2026, Los Angeles County Fire Department and CAL FIRE investigators concluded that electrical arcing on an out-of-service Southern California Edison (SCE) transmission tower caused the fire.
The Eaton Fire began on January 7, 2025, at approximately 6:18 p.m. near Altadena Drive and Midwick Drive in the Eaton Canyon area. On August 4, 2026, the Los Angeles County Fire Department released the findings of its joint investigation with CAL FIRE. Investigators concluded that the fire was caused by “electrical arcing events that took place on the out-of-service Southern California Edison (SCE) tower.”
According to the report, the arcing caused material to fall into dry vegetation at the base of the tower, which ignited about 12 seconds later. SCE said it was “likely our equipment was associated with the ignition of the Eaton Fire,” according to the Associated Press.
What started as a small fire quickly became the second-most destructive wildfire in California history, according to CAL FIRE, fueled by powerful Santa Ana winds with gusts up to 100 mph.
The Eaton Fire’s impact on Altadena and the surrounding area was devastating:
For thousands of families and businesses, the Eaton Fire didn't just destroy buildings; it destroyed lives, memories, and livelihoods. Many survivors face the overwhelming task of rebuilding while dealing with insurance companies that may deny or minimize legitimate claims.
The areas hardest hit by the Eaton Fire include:
Eaton Fire lawsuits against Southern California Edison (SCE) are proceeding in Los Angeles Superior Court, where Judge Laura A. Seigle oversees the coordinated cases. More than 47,000 plaintiffs, representing more than 18,000 households and businesses, are suing SCE and its parent company, Edison International.
January 25, 2027: The first bellwether trial, a test case covering the claims of eight households, is currently scheduled to begin. Bellwether trials help both sides gauge how juries may value similar claims. The eight households include four whose homes were destroyed, two with partial property losses, and two with smoke and ash contamination. SCE has asked the court to postpone the trial.
October 20, 2026: SCE announced that claims to its voluntary Wildfire Recovery Compensation Program must be submitted by November 30, 2026. SCE reported nearly $1.1 billion in offers to more than 7,700 claimants. The company also noted that injury and wrongful death lawsuits may face a deadline as early as January 7, 2027.
October 8, 2026: Judge Seigle heard SCE’s motion to postpone the January 25, 2027 bellwether trial and continued the motion without ruling.
September 22, 2026: Judge Seigle denied Edison International’s motion for summary judgment, which sought to remove SCE’s parent company from the case. The ruling keeps Edison International in the litigation; it does not decide whether either company is liable.
August 4, 2026: The Los Angeles County Fire Department and CAL FIRE released their joint investigation report. It concluded that electrical arcing on an out-of-service SCE transmission tower caused the Eaton Fire.
January 16, 2026: SCE filed cross-complaints against Los Angeles County, Pasadena Water and Power, five other water agencies, and Southern California Gas Co., alleging that their failures contributed to the deaths and destruction.
SCE’s Wildfire Recovery Compensation Program offers to pay Eaton Fire victims directly, outside of court. The program is voluntary. Before you apply or accept an offer, understand how it works:
Wisner Baum will review an SCE offer with you at no cost and explain how it compares to what you may be able to recover in a lawsuit.
An insurance claim and a lawsuit against SCE are separate, and you can pursue both. Wisner Baum clients get help with the insurance side at no additional cost, including:
If your insurer’s rebuild estimate doesn’t match your contractor’s bid, or your additional living expense payments are ending before your home is rebuilt, call (310) 207-3233. We’ll review where your claim stands and explain your options.
Wisner Baum’s Eaton Fire lawsuit filed in January 2025 asserts claims for negligence, inverse condemnation, premises liability, trespass, nuisance, and violations of the Public Utilities Code and Health and Safety Code, and it seeks punitive damages.
Inverse condemnation is a constitutional claim for damage to property. California courts have applied it to utilities in wildfire cases, allowing property owners to recover without proving negligence. It covers property damage only; personal injury, emotional distress, and punitive damages must be pursued through other claims, such as negligence. Whether inverse condemnation applies in the Eaton Fire cases has not been finally decided.
Among other things, Eaton Fire lawsuits allege SCE:
California law sets strict deadlines for filing a lawsuit. For the Eaton Fire, which began on January 7, 2025, the key dates are:
Some deadlines can be extended, such as for claims belonging to children. Don’t count on an exception. Call us at (310) 207-3233 to find out which deadline applies to you.
As an Eaton Fire survivor, you may wonder about homeowner insurance claims and whether you have legal rights that extend beyond what the policy may cover.
People who suffered losses in the Eaton Fire may be able to recover compensation for:
Insurance companies may attempt to undervalue or deny your claim. Our Eaton Fire lawyers can help you navigate your insurance claim and fight to hold SCE accountable for the full extent of your losses.
Not sure if you’re eligible? Here’s what you need to know:
Still have questions? Our wildfire attorneys will review your circumstances and explain your best legal path.
If you suffered losses in the Eaton Fire, you have rights. Below we cover the types of claims people may be eligible to pursue to cover the costs of their losses.
Homeowners can file claims to cover rebuilding costs, personal property replacement, and additional living expenses (ALE) for temporary housing if they were displaced. While insurance typically covers tangible losses, it often fails to compensate wildfire victims for the entirety of their losses. These claims may exclude things like emotional distress, smoke damage, and underinsured property values (e.g., land devaluation). Lawsuits against Southern California Edison (SCE) can seek these damages.
Renters with insurance may recover personal property loss for fire/smoke-damaged belongings (clothing, furniture, electronics), replacement cost (actual cash value or full replacement, depending on policy terms), and additional living expenses for temporary housing.
With or without insurance, renters may pursue a lawsuit against SCE for losses that insurance did not cover.
Small businesses impacted by the Eaton Fire can leverage insurance coverage to recover losses. Commercial property insurance covers structural repairs, equipment replacement, and inventory losses, while business interruption insurance reimburses lost income during closures. Both are critical for restaurants, retailers, and service providers that were forced to shut down.
After the Eaton Fire, many victims have questions about how their insurance policies interact with potential lawsuits against SCE. These options are not mutually exclusive—filing an insurance claim can help provide immediate relief, while participating in a lawsuit may allow you to recover additional damages that insurance does not cover.
| Option | What It Offers | Pros | Cons |
| Insurance Claim | Compensation based on policy limits for property and related loss | - Fastest initial payouts
- Covers direct, listed losses |
- Often excludes lost value/undervalued property
- May not cover emotional damages and future costs |
| Lawsuit vs SCE | Legal claim for damages, including losses insurance does not cover | - Can seek damages insurance does not cover
- May include emotional distress, underinsured losses, and punitive damages |
- Longer timeline
- Requires more documentation and participation |
Unsure what to do? Contact our wildfire lawyers for a no-cost claim assessment.
Navigating the wildfire claims process can be overwhelming, so here’s a step-by-step guide to help you understand what’s ahead:
Insurance claims can take months to resolve. Large wildfire lawsuits often take two years or more. In the Eaton Fire litigation, the first bellwether trial is scheduled for January 2027.
Our Eaton Fire lawyers can assist you in various ways, including:
Our attorneys have represented wildfire survivors in Los Angeles and across California. Our wildfire team offers:
If you've been affected by the Eaton Fire, don't face the aftermath alone. The experienced wildfire attorneys at Wisner Baum are ready to fight for your rights and help you rebuild your life.
Remember, we work on a contingency fee basis – you don't pay unless we win your case. Reach out today to get started on your claim.
The aftermath of the Eaton Fire can feel overwhelming, but you don’t have to face the insurance and legal maze alone. Wisner Baum, a trusted wildfire law firm with decades of experience representing wildfire victims across California, is here to help you pursue full and fair compensation as you rebuild.
Wisner Baum was among the first to file an Eaton Fire lawsuit against Southern California Edison (SCE), alleging that SCE’s equipment sparked the fire. Our wildfire attorneys have successfully resolved hundreds of claims for victims of major California wildfires, including the Woolsey, Thomas, Camp, and Bobcat fires.
If you’ve been affected by the Eaton Fire, you can get a free and confidential case evaluation by calling Wisner Baum at (310) 207-3233 or visiting our contact page to schedule a consultation.
Let Wisner Baum’s experienced wildfire attorneys guide you through this difficult time and fight for your rights so you can rebuild with confidence.
"Wisner Baum gave exceptional attention to all aspects of the case, detailed inquiry, and tenacious overview of all the information submitted. The paralegals are efficient and diligent. I was completely surprised to find an empathic personal message to take care of my own health during the challenging time of being a full-time caretaker.*"
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case.
The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial
Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million.
Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
We recommend these steps:
Yes. More than 47,000 plaintiffs are suing Southern California Edison (SCE) and Edison International in Los Angeles Superior Court. The lawsuits allege the blaze started due to SCE’s electrical equipment, which should have been de-energized amid Red Flag warnings in Eaton Canyon.
In August 2026, Los Angeles County Fire Department and CAL FIRE investigators concluded that electrical arcing on an out-of-service Southern California Edison (SCE) transmission tower caused the fire. California courts have held that inverse condemnation can make a utility liable for property damage caused by its equipment without proof of negligence, though whether it applies in the Eaton Fire cases has not been finally decided. SCE has filed cross-complaints contending that Los Angeles County, several water agencies, and SoCalGas share responsibility.
Yes. The Eaton Fire lawsuit is not limited to homeowners. Renters, business owners, and others who suffered losses—including personal property damage, evacuation expenses, lost wages, and business interruption—may all be eligible to join.
Yes. Insurance payouts often don't cover the full extent of your losses, such as underinsured property, emotional distress, or punitive damages. A lawsuit against Southern California Edison (SCE) can seek these additional damages.
Applying alone does not, according to SCE. But accepting an offer means signing a settlement agreement that includes a promise not to sue. The lawsuit deadline also keeps running while you wait for an offer. Talk to a lawyer before you accept.
Lawsuits may help you recover damages that insurance typically excludes or undervalues, such as:
The more evidence you have, the stronger your case will be. It's helpful to gather photos and videos of the damage, receipts for temporary living expenses and repairs, and any correspondence with your insurance company. Our legal team can help you identify and collect the necessary evidence to support your claim.
Deadlines depend on the type of claim. Personal injury and wrongful death claims generally must be filed within two years, which for the Eaton Fire may be as early as January 7, 2027. Property damage claims generally have three years, or as early as January 7, 2028. Deadlines for claims against government agencies have generally passed. Contact a lawyer as soon as possible so that no deadline is missed.
The timeline can vary. While simple insurance claims may resolve in months, complex lawsuits like the Eaton Fire litigation can take years. The legal team at Wisner Baum works to resolve cases as promptly as possible, but we are also prepared to fight for a full recovery for as long as it takes.
Many wildfire claims and lawsuits resolve through settlement negotiations rather than trial. However, if a case goes to trial, your presence may be necessary. We will keep you informed and prepared every step of the way.
California regulations generally require insurers to acknowledge a claim within 15 calendar days (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 10, § 2695.5(e)). If your insurer is delaying, denying your valid claim without a proper investigation, or offering a settlement that you know is insufficient, you may have a "bad faith" claim. Our free insurance consulting can help you respond, and a lawsuit against SCE may recover losses your insurer did not pay.
It will take some months to determine the cost of rebuilding. The insurance company may bring in contractors to estimate the cost. You should also bring in your own contractor to bid on the rebuilding costs. We also recommend developing a written "Scope of Loss" - a detailed breakdown of all items and services necessary to rebuild or repair your house. This ensures everyone is on the same page regarding the damage to be repaired as well as what needs to be rebuilt.
If your business was affected by the Eaton Fire, you may be able to pursue certain damages. Business owners affected by the Eaton Fire may be eligible for compensation for:
Our attorneys can help you navigate both personal and business-related wildfire claims.
No. Wisner Baum works on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay nothing up front, and we only get paid if we successfully secure compensation for you.