No Fees Unless We Win
(310) 207-3233
Menu

Eaton Fire Lawsuit

Wildfire Lawsuits Against Southern California Edison

The 2025 Eaton Fire devastated Altadena and surrounding communities across Los Angeles County, destroying over 9,400 structures and claiming 19 lives. 

Deadline alert: Personal injury and wrongful death claims from the Eaton Fire may face a filing deadline as early as January 7, 2027. Property damage claims may face a deadline as early as January 7, 2028. Call (310) 207-3233 or contact us today for a free, confidential case evaluation.

Wisner Baum attorneys filed an Eaton Fire lawsuit against SCE on January 28, 2025. The complaint alleges that SCE equipment sparked the fire and that the utility is responsible for the widespread destruction. 

In an interview with Los Angeles radio station KNX 1070, Wisner Baum’s lead wildfire lawyer, Ari Friedman, said his firm “feels very confident that Edison’s equipment is to blame for the Eaton Fire.”

In August 2026, Los Angeles County Fire Department and CAL FIRE investigators concluded that electrical arcing on an out-of-service Southern California Edison (SCE) transmission tower caused the fire.  

How Did the Eaton Fire Start?

The Eaton Fire began on January 7, 2025, at approximately 6:18 p.m. near Altadena Drive and Midwick Drive in the Eaton Canyon area. On August 4, 2026, the Los Angeles County Fire Department released the findings of its joint investigation with CAL FIRE. Investigators concluded that the fire was caused by “electrical arcing events that took place on the out-of-service Southern California Edison (SCE) tower.”

According to the report, the arcing caused material to fall into dry vegetation at the base of the tower, which ignited about 12 seconds later. SCE said it was “likely our equipment was associated with the ignition of the Eaton Fire,” according to the Associated Press.

What started as a small fire quickly became the second-most destructive wildfire in California history, according to CAL FIRE, fueled by powerful Santa Ana winds with gusts up to 100 mph. 

The Eaton Fire’s impact on Altadena and the surrounding area was devastating:

  • Over 14,000 acres burned.
  • Over 9,400 structures destroyed.
  • Over 1,070 additional structures were damaged.
  • 19 people were killed, making it the fifth-deadliest wildfire in California history.
  • Over 100,000 people evacuated from their homes.
  • Unsafe water notices issued for parts of the fire area.
  • Billions in estimated property damage and economic losses.

For thousands of families and businesses, the Eaton Fire didn't just destroy buildings; it destroyed lives, memories, and livelihoods. Many survivors face the overwhelming task of rebuilding while dealing with insurance companies that may deny or minimize legitimate claims.

What Areas Are Affected by the Eaton Fire?

The areas hardest hit by the Eaton Fire include:

  • Altadena: Entire blocks of homes and businesses have been destroyed. Specific streets mentioned include:
    • Poppyfields Drive: Multiple homes on this street were reduced to rubble.
    • East Altadena Drive: Satellite imagery shows significant destruction along this road.
  • Pasadena: Parts of Pasadena have also been impacted.
  • Foothill communities: Sierra Madre also sustained damage. La Cañada Flintridge and other foothill communities were placed under evacuation orders.
  • Old Town Altadena: This historic area has been particularly hard hit, with many iconic structures now gone. 

Eaton Fire Lawsuit Updates 2026

Eaton Fire lawsuits against Southern California Edison (SCE) are proceeding in Los Angeles Superior Court, where Judge Laura A. Seigle oversees the coordinated cases. More than 47,000 plaintiffs, representing more than 18,000 households and businesses, are suing SCE and its parent company, Edison International.

January 25, 2027: The first bellwether trial, a test case covering the claims of eight households, is currently scheduled to begin. Bellwether trials help both sides gauge how juries may value similar claims. The eight households include four whose homes were destroyed, two with partial property losses, and two with smoke and ash contamination. SCE has asked the court to postpone the trial.

October 20, 2026: SCE announced that claims to its voluntary Wildfire Recovery Compensation Program must be submitted by November 30, 2026. SCE reported nearly $1.1 billion in offers to more than 7,700 claimants. The company also noted that injury and wrongful death lawsuits may face a deadline as early as January 7, 2027.

October 8, 2026: Judge Seigle heard SCE’s motion to postpone the January 25, 2027 bellwether trial and continued the motion without ruling. 

September 22, 2026: Judge Seigle denied Edison International’s motion for summary judgment, which sought to remove SCE’s parent company from the case. The ruling keeps Edison International in the litigation; it does not decide whether either company is liable.

August 4, 2026: The Los Angeles County Fire Department and CAL FIRE released their joint investigation report. It concluded that electrical arcing on an out-of-service SCE transmission tower caused the Eaton Fire.

January 16, 2026: SCE filed cross-complaints against Los Angeles County, Pasadena Water and Power, five other water agencies, and Southern California Gas Co., alleging that their failures contributed to the deaths and destruction.

Should You Accept SCE’s Compensation Offer?

SCE’s Wildfire Recovery Compensation Program offers to pay Eaton Fire victims directly, outside of court. The program is voluntary. Before you apply or accept an offer, understand how it works:

  • Claims are due November 30, 2026. SCE says claims submitted by that date will continue to be reviewed afterward, as long as claimants stay responsive to requests for information.
  • Accepting an offer ends your right to sue. Under the program protocol, a claimant’s legal rights are affected only when the claimant accepts an offer and signs a full release of liability.
  • Applying does not stop the lawsuit deadline. SCE says submitting a claim and reviewing an offer do not waive your rights. But the statute of limitations keeps running while you wait.
  • Injury claims have specific requirements. Under the program protocol, an injury claim generally requires overnight hospitalization or outpatient treatment between January 7 and January 15, 2025, among other conditions.
  • SCE sets the offers. SCE says its offers track settlement values from past wildfire cases. Survivor groups, including the Eaton Fire Survivors Network, have criticized the program, and some survivors have said its payment caps are too low.

Wisner Baum will review an SCE offer with you at no cost and explain how it compares to what you may be able to recover in a lawsuit. 

Help With Your Eaton Fire Insurance Claim

An insurance claim and a lawsuit against SCE are separate, and you can pursue both. Wisner Baum clients get help with the insurance side at no additional cost, including:

  • Reviewing your policy
  • Preparing your contents inventory and scope of loss
  • Documenting additional living expenses
  • Responding when an insurer delays, underpays, or denies a claim

If your insurer’s rebuild estimate doesn’t match your contractor’s bid, or your additional living expense payments are ending before your home is rebuilt, call (310) 207-3233. We’ll review where your claim stands and explain your options.

Allegations in Eaton Fire Lawsuits Against Southern California Edison (SCE)

Wisner Baum’s Eaton Fire lawsuit filed in January 2025 asserts claims for negligence, inverse condemnation, premises liability, trespass, nuisance, and violations of the Public Utilities Code and Health and Safety Code, and it seeks punitive damages. 

Inverse condemnation is a constitutional claim for damage to property. California courts have applied it to utilities in wildfire cases, allowing property owners to recover without proving negligence. It covers property damage only; personal injury, emotional distress, and punitive damages must be pursued through other claims, such as negligence. Whether inverse condemnation applies in the Eaton Fire cases has not been finally decided.

Among other things, Eaton Fire lawsuits allege SCE:

  • Did not de-energize all of its transmission lines in Eaton Canyon despite repeated Red Flag warnings from the National Weather Service.
  • Failed to adequately inspect, maintain, and repair its transmission equipment.
  • Failed to manage vegetation near its electrical equipment.
  • Caused an electrical arcing event on its transmission lines that ignited vegetation at the base of a tower.

Eaton Fire Lawsuit Deadlines

California law sets strict deadlines for filing a lawsuit. For the Eaton Fire, which began on January 7, 2025, the key dates are:

  • Personal injury and wrongful death: generally two years under Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1, which means a deadline as early as January 7, 2027. For wrongful death, the two years generally run from the date of death.
  • Property damage, including inverse condemnation claims: generally three years under Code of Civil Procedure section 338, which means a deadline as early as January 7, 2028.
  • Claims against government agencies: a written claim generally had to be presented within six months or one year under Government Code section 911.2. For most Eaton Fire victims, those deadlines have passed.
  • SCE’s compensation program: claims must be submitted by November 30, 2026. This is a program deadline, not a lawsuit deadline.

Some deadlines can be extended, such as for claims belonging to children. Don’t count on an exception. Call us at (310) 207-3233 to find out which deadline applies to you.

Understanding Your Rights as an Eaton Fire Survivor

As an Eaton Fire survivor, you may wonder about homeowner insurance claims and whether you have legal rights that extend beyond what the policy may cover. 

People who suffered losses in the Eaton Fire may be able to recover compensation for:

  • Property damage or loss
  • Temporary housing and relocation expenses
  • Lost wages or business income
  • Medical expenses related to fire-induced injuries or illnesses
  • Emotional distress and trauma

Insurance companies may attempt to undervalue or deny your claim. Our Eaton Fire lawyers can help you navigate your insurance claim and fight to hold SCE accountable for the full extent of your losses.

Who Qualifies for an Eaton Fire Lawsuit?

Not sure if you’re eligible? Here’s what you need to know:

  • Do I have to be a homeowner? No. Homeowners, renters, and business owners who suffered property loss, evacuation costs, or other damages related to the Eaton Fire may qualify.
  • What if I already received insurance money? You may still join the lawsuit. Insurance may not pay for all of your losses. Lawsuits seek additional compensation to cover the full extent of your damages.
  • What if I live nearby but didn’t lose property? If you experienced evacuation costs, emotional trauma, or business losses—even without losing your home—you may still qualify.

Still have questions? Our wildfire attorneys will review your circumstances and explain your best legal path.

Types of Eaton Fire Claims

If you suffered losses in the Eaton Fire, you have rights. Below we cover the types of claims people may be eligible to pursue to cover the costs of their losses.

Homeowner Claims 

Homeowners can file claims to cover rebuilding costs, personal property replacement, and additional living expenses (ALE) for temporary housing if they were displaced. While insurance typically covers tangible losses, it often fails to compensate wildfire victims for the entirety of their losses. These claims may exclude things like emotional distress, smoke damage, and underinsured property values (e.g., land devaluation). Lawsuits against Southern California Edison (SCE) can seek these damages.

Renter Claims 

Renters with insurance may recover personal property loss for fire/smoke-damaged belongings (clothing, furniture, electronics), replacement cost (actual cash value or full replacement, depending on policy terms), and additional living expenses for temporary housing.

With or without insurance, renters may pursue a lawsuit against SCE for losses that insurance did not cover. 

Business Claims

Small businesses impacted by the Eaton Fire can leverage insurance coverage to recover losses. Commercial property insurance covers structural repairs, equipment replacement, and inventory losses, while business interruption insurance reimburses lost income during closures. Both are critical for restaurants, retailers, and service providers that were forced to shut down. 

Insurance Claims and Lawsuits: How They Work Together

After the Eaton Fire, many victims have questions about how their insurance policies interact with potential lawsuits against SCE. These options are not mutually exclusive—filing an insurance claim can help provide immediate relief, while participating in a lawsuit may allow you to recover additional damages that insurance does not cover.

Option What It Offers Pros Cons
Insurance Claim Compensation based on policy limits for property and related loss - Fastest initial payouts

- Covers direct, listed losses

- Often excludes lost value/undervalued property

- May not cover emotional damages and future costs

Lawsuit vs SCE Legal claim for damages, including losses insurance does not cover - Can seek damages insurance does not cover

- May include emotional distress, underinsured losses, and punitive damages

- Longer timeline

- Requires more documentation and participation


Unsure what to do? Contact our wildfire lawyers for a no-cost claim assessment.

What to Expect When You File an Eaton Canyon Fire Claim

Navigating the wildfire claims process can be overwhelming, so here’s a step-by-step guide to help you understand what’s ahead:

  1. Initial Consultation: Speak with a wildfire attorney to review your circumstances and discuss eligibility.
  2. Case Review: We gather your documentation, including insurance policies, photos, and proof of losses.
  3. Filing Your Claim/Lawsuit: Depending on your case, we’ll help you file your insurance claim and/or lawsuit against SCE.
  4. Evidence Gathering: Our legal team will collect official reports, witness statements, and technical investigations.
  5. Settlement Negotiations: We attempt to secure full and fair compensation as quickly as possible. Many cases resolve without trial.
  6. Litigation (if needed): If negotiations stall, your case may go to court.
  7. Resolution: If your case succeeds, you may receive compensation for property loss, emotional distress, business interruptions, and more.

Insurance claims can take months to resolve. Large wildfire lawsuits often take two years or more. In the Eaton Fire litigation, the first bellwether trial is scheduled for January 2027.

How We Can Help Eaton Fire Victims

Our Eaton Fire lawyers can assist you in various ways, including:

  1. Investigating the cause of the fire and identifying potentially liable parties.
  2. Assessing the full extent of your losses, including property damage, business interruption, and emotional distress.
  3. Navigating complex fire insurance claims, with support from our free insurance consultant. 
  4. Pursuing legal action against any and all negligent parties.
  5. Providing guidance on disaster relief programs, help with FEMA applications and appeals, and social worker support for housing and financial aid.

Why Choose Wisner Baum Wildfire Attorneys for Your Eaton Fire Claim?

Our attorneys have represented wildfire survivors in Los Angeles and across California. Our wildfire team offers:

  • A dedicated wildfire practice led by equity partner and trial attorney Ari S. Friedman.
  • Extensive experience handling complex wildfire litigation, with justice and compensation obtained for hundreds of victims throughout California.
  • A deep understanding of California's fire and insurance laws.
  • Free insurance consulting, FEMA help, and social worker support for our clients, at no cost.
  • A history of securing justice for survivors of major Southern California wildfires, including the Woolsey Fire, where we represented hundreds of claimants. 
  • A local presence that understands the dangers and impact of wildfires, having been litigating in the Los Angeles area for decades.

Contact an Eaton Fire Lawyer Today – Free Case Evaluation

If you've been affected by the Eaton Fire, don't face the aftermath alone. The experienced wildfire attorneys at Wisner Baum are ready to fight for your rights and help you rebuild your life.

Remember, we work on a contingency fee basis – you don't pay unless we win your case. Reach out today to get started on your claim.

Take the Next Step

The aftermath of the Eaton Fire can feel overwhelming, but you don’t have to face the insurance and legal maze alone. Wisner Baum, a trusted wildfire law firm with decades of experience representing wildfire victims across California, is here to help you pursue full and fair compensation as you rebuild.

Wisner Baum was among the first to file an Eaton Fire lawsuit against Southern California Edison (SCE), alleging that SCE’s equipment sparked the fire. Our wildfire attorneys have successfully resolved hundreds of claims for victims of major California wildfires, including the Woolsey, Thomas, Camp, and Bobcat fires.

If you’ve been affected by the Eaton Fire, you can get a free and confidential case evaluation by calling Wisner Baum at (310) 207-3233 or visiting our contact page to schedule a consultation.

Let Wisner Baum’s experienced wildfire attorneys guide you through this difficult time and fight for your rights so you can rebuild with confidence.

Get Started
Call (310) 207-3233 or fill out the form below and request a free consultation.
20,000+ Families Represented

"Wisner Baum gave exceptional attention to all aspects of the case, detailed inquiry, and tenacious overview of all the information submitted. The paralegals are efficient and diligent. I was completely surprised to find an empathic personal message to take care of my own health during the challenging time of being a full-time caretaker.*"

Mary Flores
Reviewed
on Google
Read More Reviews
Case Results
We Demand Accountability.
More Successful Results
$2.0 Billion Verdict
Personal Injury
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case. The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case. The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
Continue Reading
$2.0 Billion Verdict
Personal Injury

In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case.

The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.

$289.2 Million Verdict
Personal Injury
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million. Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million. Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
Continue Reading
$289.2 Million Verdict
Personal Injury

$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial

Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million.

Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.

$265 Million Settlement
Fatal Train Crash
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
Continue Reading
$265 Million Settlement
Fatal Train Crash

In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.

FAQs: Eaton Fire Lawsuit and Claims

We recommend these steps:

  1. Contact your insurance company to report your loss.
  2. Document everything with photos and videos of damaged property.
  3. Keep all receipts for any expenses related to evacuation, temporary housing, and essential items.
  4. Consult with a wildfire lawyer to understand your rights and options.

Yes. More than 47,000 plaintiffs are suing Southern California Edison (SCE) and Edison International in Los Angeles Superior Court. The lawsuits allege the blaze started due to SCE’s electrical equipment, which should have been de-energized amid Red Flag warnings in Eaton Canyon. 

In August 2026, Los Angeles County Fire Department and CAL FIRE investigators concluded that electrical arcing on an out-of-service Southern California Edison (SCE) transmission tower caused the fire. California courts have held that inverse condemnation can make a utility liable for property damage caused by its equipment without proof of negligence, though whether it applies in the Eaton Fire cases has not been finally decided. SCE has filed cross-complaints contending that Los Angeles County, several water agencies, and SoCalGas share responsibility.

Yes. The Eaton Fire lawsuit is not limited to homeowners. Renters, business owners, and others who suffered losses—including personal property damage, evacuation expenses, lost wages, and business interruption—may all be eligible to join.

Yes. Insurance payouts often don't cover the full extent of your losses, such as underinsured property, emotional distress, or punitive damages. A lawsuit against Southern California Edison (SCE) can seek these additional damages.

Applying alone does not, according to SCE. But accepting an offer means signing a settlement agreement that includes a promise not to sue. The lawsuit deadline also keeps running while you wait for an offer. Talk to a lawyer before you accept.

Lawsuits may help you recover damages that insurance typically excludes or undervalues, such as:

  • Unpaid deductibles
  • Underinsured property losses (e.g., rebuilding costs that exceed your policy limits)
  • Emotional distress and pain and suffering
  • Punitive damages (if a jury finds by clear and convincing evidence that SCE acted with malice, oppression, or fraud; Civil Code § 3294)

The more evidence you have, the stronger your case will be. It's helpful to gather photos and videos of the damage, receipts for temporary living expenses and repairs, and any correspondence with your insurance company. Our legal team can help you identify and collect the necessary evidence to support your claim.

Deadlines depend on the type of claim. Personal injury and wrongful death claims generally must be filed within two years, which for the Eaton Fire may be as early as January 7, 2027. Property damage claims generally have three years, or as early as January 7, 2028. Deadlines for claims against government agencies have generally passed. Contact a lawyer as soon as possible so that no deadline is missed.

The timeline can vary. While simple insurance claims may resolve in months, complex lawsuits like the Eaton Fire litigation can take years. The legal team at Wisner Baum works to resolve cases as promptly as possible, but we are also prepared to fight for a full recovery for as long as it takes.

Many wildfire claims and lawsuits resolve through settlement negotiations rather than trial. However, if a case goes to trial, your presence may be necessary. We will keep you informed and prepared every step of the way.

California regulations generally require insurers to acknowledge a claim within 15 calendar days (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 10, § 2695.5(e)). If your insurer is delaying, denying your valid claim without a proper investigation, or offering a settlement that you know is insufficient, you may have a "bad faith" claim. Our free insurance consulting can help you respond, and a lawsuit against SCE may recover losses your insurer did not pay.

It will take some months to determine the cost of rebuilding. The insurance company may bring in contractors to estimate the cost. You should also bring in your own contractor to bid on the rebuilding costs. We also recommend developing a written "Scope of Loss" - a detailed breakdown of all items and services necessary to rebuild or repair your house. This ensures everyone is on the same page regarding the damage to be repaired as well as what needs to be rebuilt.

If your business was affected by the Eaton Fire, you may be able to pursue certain damages. Business owners affected by the Eaton Fire may be eligible for compensation for:

  • Property damage
  • Business interruption losses
  • Loss of inventory
  • Relocation expenses

Our attorneys can help you navigate both personal and business-related wildfire claims.

No. Wisner Baum works on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay nothing up front, and we only get paid if we successfully secure compensation for you.

When companies choose profit over people, we fight. Wisner Baum exposes injustice, demands accountability, and delivers real results for real people. Your Path to Justice Starts Here.
Los Angeles
11111 Santa Monica
Blvd Suite 1750
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Get Directions
Bay Area
100 Drakes Landing Road
Suite 160
Greenbrae, CA 94904
Get Directions
Washington, D.C.
2101 L St NW 

Suite 800
Washington, DC 20037
Get Directions
The information on this website is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Neither accessing this site nor reviewing its contents creates an attorney-client relationship, so please do not send confidential information until such a relationship is established in writing. This site may be considered attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Some matters may be handled with or referred to other firms as co-counsel.
Send Us Your Case Details
We’ll respond and let you know the best way to proceed with your case.
crossarrow-up
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram