Skip to Content
No Fees Unless We Win 855-948-5098
Top
Top Gardasil Lawyers in America Client Focused. Trial Ready. Billions Won.
  • A Leading Pharmaceutical Litigation Firm
  • Successfully Handled Thousands of Prescription Drug Cases
  • Extensive Track Record Defeating Preemption / Immunity
  • Public Health Advocates Helping to Improve Drug Safety

Gardasil Lawsuit Attorneys

Research has linked the Gardasil HPV vaccine to serious side effects, including postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and premature ovarian failure (POF), the latter of which can result in infertility.

The attorneys at Wisner Baum are in active litigation against Merck, the manufacturer of the Gardasil HPV vaccine. Our lawsuits allege Merck conducted fraudulent clinical trials for the Gardasil vaccine and failed to warn about severe side effects, which can remain serious for years after the Gardasil shot. We have filed multiple cases for plaintiffs alleging Gardasil caused dysautonomia, cervical cancer (which the vaccine is supposed to protect against), and wrongful death.

Senior partner Bijan Esfandiari serves as co-lead trial counsel in the federal Gardasil MDL (multidistrict litigation), where over 140 cases were consolidated as of February 2024. The MDL should not be confused with a Gardasil class action; it is a group of individual HPV vaccine lawsuits filed in different districts that make similar allegations against a common defendant (Merck). There is no Gardasil class action.

View the Most Recent Gardasil Lawsuit Updates Here

If you would like more information on how to join the Gardasil lawsuit, please contact us or call 855-948-5098 today for a free case evaluation. HPV vaccine side effect lawsuits need to be filed within a specific time frame called the statute of limitations. To ensure that your legal rights are protected, we highly recommend you contact a lawyer as soon as possible to see if you qualify for a Gardasil vaccine lawsuit.


On This Page:

CALL (855) 948-5098

Contact our experienced attorneys to learn about your legal options. Your consultation is free and confidential.

What is Gardasil?

Gardasil is a vaccine now approved for use by adolescents, men and women between the ages of 9 and 45, to prevent sexually transmitted infection from several types of human papillomavirus (HPV). Certain types of HPV are associated with cervical cancer and Gardasil was heavily promoted as a necessary protection against cervical cancer. The vaccine later received FDA approval for protection against other cancers and diseases in males and females in the same age range.

There are over 200 types of HPV, each with a number. Gardasil was designed to protect against certain types of HPV. High-risk HPV is associated with potentially pre-cancerous cell growth on the cervix. Low-risk types pose little or no risk of cervical cancer, but they are associated with skin and genital warts.

  • Gardasil 4: Gardasil “quadrivalent,” or Gardasil 4, was designed to prevent infection from two of the high-risk HPV types (16 and 18) and two low-risk HPV types (6 and 11). The vaccine was initially approved for girls and women ages 9-26. The American Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended in 2007 that Gardasil become a routine vaccination for girls ages 11-12. The Gardasil 4 vaccine is no longer available in the U.S. It was replaced by Gardasil 9.
  • Gardasil 9: Gardasil 9 was designed to prevent infection from seven types of high-risk HPV (16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, 58) and two low-risk types (6 and 11). Since May 2017, it has been the only HPV vaccine available in the U.S. In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved expanded use of the Gardasil 9 vaccine to include individuals between the ages of 27 and 45.

What is the Gardasil Controversy?

Underlying the entire Gardasil controversy are clinical trials (human testing) that victims allege were fraudulently conducted and reported. Preliminary evidence compiled by a team of Gardasil attorneys and investigators suggests that the clinical trials Merck conducted for the Gardasil HPV vaccine were flagrantly deceptive and unscientific.

According to Mary Holland and Kim Mack Rosenberg, and Eileen Iorio, co-authors of the book, The HPV Vaccine On Trial: Seeking Justice For a Generation Betrayed, “none of the participants in the [Gardasil] clinical trials received a true saline placebo,” which means the clinical trials failed to measure the effects of Gardasil against a true control. Instead of receiving a placebo, some clinical trial subjects received aluminum-containing adjuvants, chemical mixtures, and other vaccines, which masked adverse events and made Gardasil seem safer than it would have otherwise.

According to Holland, Mack Rosenberg, and Iorio, “HPV vaccines have never been proven to prevent against cervical or other cancer.”

Is Gardasil Dangerous?

Gardasil ingredients include virus like particles (VLPs) which are genetically engineered from a protein of HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18 (and Gardasil 9 includes additional types: 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58); amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate (aka, AAHS); yeast protein; sodium chloride; L-histidine; polysorbate 80; sodium borate; and water for injection. As you can see, each Gardasil shot contains ingredients in addition to the genetically modified virus like particles. These ingredients are capable of causing adverse reactions in their own right.

In a 2020 peer-reviewed study, Dr. Jørgensen and other researchers analyzed the available clinical trial data for all HPV vaccines, including Gardasil. The researchers found that the HPV vaccines were associated with a nearly two-fold increased risk of POTS. The study authors further reported that “HPV vaccines increased serious nervous disorders.”

The Gardasil attorneys at Wisner Baum have filed numerous lawsuits on behalf of young adults who suffered Gardasil shot reactions. Many of our clients allege they developed POTS from Gardasil. Others say the HPV vaccine caused other autoimmune diseases and debilitating injuries.

Gardasil Vaccine Deaths and Injuries

The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) was established in 1990 as a means of detecting problems in vaccines. The system is managed by the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

As of Jan. 14, 2020, the VAERS database contains over 64,000 case reports of adverse reactions tied to HPV vaccines worldwide (over 50,000 in the U.S.). More than 9,600 cases reported serious adverse events, including 547 deaths. 

Serious adverse events are defined as adverse reactions that result in death, are life-threatening, require hospitalization or lengthen a hospital stay, or result in persistent or significant disability. However, it is estimated that only 1% of serious adverse events are actually reported to VAERS.

The vast majority of HPV vaccine cases, serious cases, and deaths reported in VAERS are tied to Merck’s HPV Gardasil vaccine. For example, of the death cases found in VAERS, Merck is named in 399 (73%).

It Isn’t Just Harmful for Girls – Boys Have Also Suffered Life-Altering Side Effects After Gardasil

As a vaccine that purportedly prevents cervical cancer, Gardasil is widely viewed as a “girl’s vaccine.” But many boys and young men also receive the vaccine, in part because Merck has aggressively advertised the HPV vaccine since it was approved for boys in 2009.

Some of the young men we represent who are pursuing justice against Merck for their post-Gardasil injuries include:

  • Merrick Brunker, who suffers from Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS).
  • Michael “Mike” Colbath, who suffers from Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS), Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), Idiopathic Hypersomnia (IH), Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), and Gastroparesis.
  • Zachariah (Zach) Otto, who suffers from Guillain–Barré Syndrome (GBS), Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS), Orthostatic Intolerance (OI), Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CDIP), Small Fiber Neuropathy (SFN), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP), Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM), Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS), Transverse Myelitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Interconnective Tissue Disorder, Autoimmune Pancreatitis (AIP), and Autoimmune Hepatitis.

LISTEN! POTSCAST - Gardasil POTS Litigation with Attorney Drew Downing              
We highly recommend listening to this POTSCAST podcast interview of our colleague, vaccine injury attorney Drew Downing, from October 31, 2023. Drew is a highly experienced vaccine injury lawyer that we work with in the Gardasil litigation. He represents individual’s Gardasil injury cases in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP). Drew serves as a strong advocate for individuals and families who are obviously going through a difficult time and need counsel on how to navigate through the legal system and program. Anyone that chooses to procedurally leave the NVICP may then file a civil lawsuit against Merck via our firm, to seek compensation and justice.

Continue Reading Read Less

Gardasil Lawsuit Seeks Punitive Damages Against Merck for Fraud, Deceit and Negligence

Wisner Baum is one of the leading law firms filing Merck Gardasil lawsuits. In 2019, we joined forces with other attorneys to bring our expertise in litigating against big pharma in a Gardasil civil lawsuit pending in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles on behalf of a woman who suffered severe adverse immunological and other adverse reactions, including postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) after receiving three injections of the Gardasil vaccine. Symptoms of POTS relate to reduced blood volume when a person stands up after lying down, resulting in lightheadedness, fainting and rapid heartbeat. The condition can be incapacitating.

The Gardasil lawsuit allegations against Merck include fraud, deceit and negligence for:

  • Failing to disclose important information regarding Gardasil’s safety and effectiveness.
  • Failing to perform essential “scientific and medical investigations and studies relating to the safety, effectiveness and need for the Gardasil vaccine” as required by FDA regulations.
  • Manipulating consumers by preying on their fear of cancer and by “repeatedly stating, representing, urging and implying” that it was necessary for girls and young women to take the Gardasil vaccine to prevent cervical cancer.

The suit further alleges that Merck failed to properly warn consumers of the risk of serious adverse reactions tied to the administration of the Gardasil HPV vaccine and failed to inform them of material facts related to the vaccine, including:

  • The Gardasil shot was only known to be effective for five years.
  • Other methods were known to be effective in avoiding the HPV virus.
  • The risk that an HPV infection would lead to precancerous lesions was minimal.
  • Existing methods for diagnosing and treating HPV precancerous lesions or cancer were effective.

The Gardasil vaccine lawsuit also seeks punitive damages due to Merck’s alleged deceit and fraud.

Gardasil Makes Good Vaccines Look Bad

There is currently a great deal of controversy surrounding vaccines. Our firm wishes to stress that we are not against vaccines. They have the potential to eradicate disease and save millions of lives. We are, however, against intentional efforts to mislead consumers about the safety and effectiveness of a drug or vaccine. We have always fought-- and will continue to fight-- for the rights of consumers to be fully and honestly informed about risks associated with any drug, vaccine, or medical device. We will work tirelessly to ensure those rights are defended and victims of injustice are compensated for their injuries.

See if you qualify for a Gardasil HPV vaccine lawsuit by clicking here and filling out our contact form. 

Gardasil Lawsuit Attorneys With a Proven Track Record Against Major Pharmaceutical Companies

Wisner Baum represents individuals who were harmed by HPV vaccine side effects. If you or a member of your family suffered an adverse reaction after a Gardasil injection, we recommend that you speak with an experienced attorney to discuss the possibility of pursuing a Gardasil shot lawsuit. Even if you suffered from Gardasil side effects years after injection, you may have a claim.

Bijan Esfandiari

Learn more about the Gardasil HPV Vaccine Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in this interview with Gardasil injury lawyer and Wisner Baum senior shareholder Bijan Esfandiari. The Gardasil MDL, which was approved after this interview was conducted in August of 2022, allows HPV vaccine injury cases to move into coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings. People who allege in  lawsuits that they sustained debilitating Gardasil side effects will now be able to have their day in court.

Wisner Baum is evaluating lawsuit claims based on the following HPV vaccine side effects after the Gardasil shot (or shots):

  • Auto-immune disorders
  • Chronic fatigue syndromes
  • Chronic pain syndromes, including Chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS)
  • Death
  • Dysautonomia
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
  • Lupus
  • Movement disorders
  • Neurological disorders
  • Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS)
  • Reproductive disorders, including premature ovarian failure (POF)
  • Small fiber neuropathy

If you or someone in your family suffered side effects related to the HPV vaccine, we would like the opportunity to hear your story. You may be able to pursue legal action in a Gardasil lawsuit.

Talk to a Gardasil Lawyer About Your Claim

If you or a loved one has suffered serious adverse reactions after a Gardasil 4 or Gardasil 9 injection, we encourage you to speak with an experienced Gardasil attorney. Our firm has been a leader in harmful drug and medical device litigation for more than 25 years. We know what it takes to go toe-to-toe against the largest drug companies in the world.

Over the years, we have successfully litigated against many of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world, obtaining justice and maximum compensation on behalf of clients. Across all areas of practice, we have won more than $4 billion in settlements and verdicts.

Our verdicts and settlements include:

Our firm has the resources and experience to get the justice and compensation you deserve. Call us today at (855) 948-5098 or contact us for a free and confidential Gardasil case evaluation.

Gardasil Lawsuit Updates

Have questions? We are here to help. Give us a call at 855-948-5098 today!

  • April 2, 2024

    There are now 168 HPV vaccine claims in the federal Gardasil MDL.
  • March 1, 2024

    We have an updated case count in the Gardasil MDL. As of today, 143 claims are pending in the Gardasil Products Liability Litigation before Judge Kenneth D. Bell in North Carolina. Our vaccine attorneys have several cases making their way through Vaccine Court, so we anticipate this number to increase steadily in the next few months.

    Last month, our attorneys filed two new Gardasil death cases on behalf of two mothers who allege the HPV vaccine caused severe autoimmune and neurological dysfunction, ultimately resulting in the deaths of their daughters.

  • February 6, 2024

    As of today, the Gardasil MDL has 140 cases pending, per the latest MDL Statistics report. We expect this number to continue rising in the coming weeks as we have numerous HPV vaccine claims making their way through Vaccine Court. Most of our cases in the MDL allege Gardasil causes infertility, POTS, or other autoimmune conditions.
  • January 8, 2024

    January is cervical cancer awareness month, which means HPV vaccination will be broadcast as a “primary prevention” mechanism against cervical cancer. As attorneys litigating cases for those harmed by the Gardasil vaccine, we wanted to take a moment to provide some important information on the HPV vaccine and cervical cancer.

    Merck has previously marketed Gardasil as a “cervical cancer vaccine” and asserted that Gardasil provides lifetime immunity to cervical, anal, and other HPV-associated cancers. Our lawsuits allege Merck does not have any scientifically reliable basis to make these claims. The question of whether the HPV vaccine prevents cancer is unproven, and evidence exists that Gardasil may actually increase the risk of cervical cancer in those previously exposed to HPV rather than prevent it.

    We filed a case last year on behalf of a young woman who alleges Gardasil caused her cervical cancer. “Because most of her treatment was directed at her cervix,” the complaint states, “her ovaries were also affected, putting her into menopause in her 20s…She will never be able to have children of her own because her eggs are no longer viable due to the cancer treatment.”

    Our complaint accuses Merck of falsely advertising and overstating Gardasil’s safety and effectiveness, which not only failed to prevent our client’s cervical cancer, it potentially caused her to develop cancer.

    Raising awareness about cervical cancer is important. But the public deserves to be fully informed about the potential for harm that comes with HPV vaccination.

  • December 19, 2023

    Cases in the Gardasil MDL have increased over the last few weeks. There are now 132 cases pending in the MDL, with more being filed every month. As we look forward to 2024, Gardasil lawyers in the plaintiffs’ leadership continue to conduct discovery and gather evidence. We still believe that the first Gardasil trial will likely take place in early 2025, but that could change. In a previous update, we noted that the first bellwether trials will focus on premature ovarian failure (POF) and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).
  • December 1, 2023

    The federal Gardasil MDL continues to grow with new cases added each month. As of today, there are 104 cases pending in the MDL. Our firm has 140 cases that have made their way through Vaccine Court and will soon be filed in the MDL, so the number of cases will increase significantly over the next few months.

    As for the California Gardasil litigation, we have seven cases pending with more to be filed in the coming months.

  • November 2, 2023

    We recently received some requests for data on the number of Gardasil claims in Vaccine Court. Since February 2007, there have been 844 Gardasil petitions filed in the VICP, including 22 for wrongful death as of October 1, 2023. More than 200 HPV vaccine claims are still pending.

    As for the ongoing Gardasil MDL, there are now 110 cases consolidated in federal court. The cases considered for bellwether trials allege two serious Gardasil side effects:

    Premature Ovarian Insufficiency (POI) / Premature Ovarian Failure (POF): A debilitating condition that manifests when a woman's ovaries do not function properly before the age of 40. POI / POF may result in irregular or absent menstrual periods and infertility. Numerous factors contribute to the onset of POI / POF, including genetic predispositions, the presence of autoimmune diseases, and specific medical treatments. You can read more about Gardasil and ovarian failure in our blog – Gardasil HPV Vaccine Studies.

    Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS): A condition characterized by an abnormal escalation in heart rate upon transitioning from a reclining or seated position to an upright stance. This physiological anomaly elicits distressing symptoms ranging from dizziness and lightheadedness to debilitating fatigue and, at times, episodes of fainting. You can learn more about POTS symptoms and the link between Gardasil and POTS in our blog – Can Gardasil Cause POTS?

    We can also report that there are several cases filed in California state court as the litigation is starting to grow.

  • October 1, 2023

    If you are curious to know more about the scientific research linking the HPV vaccine to autoimmune disorders like POTS, dysautonomia, CRPS, POF, and several other health issues, we recently posted a blog detailing findings from dozens of studies, as well as links to the studies themselves.

    The Gardasil MDL will soon include more than 100 claims. As of the latest MDL statistics report, there are 96 active cases in the Gardasil MDL.

  • September 12, 2023

    As of today, there are 94 Gardasil claims pending in the MDL with more cases expected to make their way into civil court over the next few months. Our firm has 135 cases that will soon be filed in the MDL as they have completed their obligation in the United States Court of Federal Claims, Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). We have an additional 66 Gardasil claims pending in the VICP and 52 cases soon to be filed in the VICP.
  • September 1, 2023

    The federal Judge overseeing the Gardasil MDL has indicated that the litigation will be bifurcated into two phases. The first phase will address the issue of general causation (whether the HPV vaccine is capable of causing the alleged side effects). The second phase will address all remaining liability and damage issues.

    Thirteen of the 16 plaintiffs selected as bellwether candidates have filed amended complaints, per the latest case management conference on August 29. Additionally, one of the cases Merck chose as a bellwether candidate was dismissed with prejudice. The company will soon select a replacement.

    With nearly 100 cases in the MDL, there are currently hundreds of additional claims making their way through Vaccine Court. We believe many of these cases will enter the MDL in the coming months.

  • August 23, 2023

    As of today, there are 92 Gardasil lawsuits pending in the MDL. In September, our firm and colleagues with cases in the MDL will start conducting depositions. A deposition is an important part of the discovery process where attorneys question experts, company representatives, and other parties under oath. In these depositions, we plan to gather testimony and facts about what Merck knew about Gardasil and its potential to cause injuries, and more.

    Other upcoming events in the Gardasil MDL: Plaintiff Expert reports are due in March of 2024, and we anticipate an order on summary judgment in the fall of 2024. This order will determine the next phase of the litigation. If Judge Conrad denies Merck’s motion for summary judgment, the litigation will move toward trial.

  • July 26, 2023

    Gardasil lawyers at Wisner Baum and colleagues in the federal MDL recently submitted a joint report to the judge overseeing the litigation. The report detailed progress as attorneys prepare the initial group of bellwether cases. Bellwether trials are essentially test cases that indicate potential results for the pool of similar lawsuits.

    A total of 16 claims were selected as bellwether cases; the plaintiffs selected five cases, Merck selected five cases, four were selected at random, and U.S. District Judge Robert J. Conrad selected the remaining two. The first Gardasil trial in the federal MDL will likely occur in late 2024 or early 2025.

    Although the outcomes of the bellwether trials will not be binding on other claims, they will be closely monitored to assess how juries respond to the evidence and expert testimony. The average payouts in these cases may influence settlement offers from Merck to avoid individual cases going before juries.

    As of this writing, there are at least 89 cases in the Gardasil MDL, though we expect this number to increase significantly in the coming months as hundreds of claims are pending in Vaccine Court. Those who allege HPV vaccine side effects must first bring their claims to Vaccine Court before they can file a lawsuit against Merck in civil court.

  • June 14, 2023

    The judge overseeing Gardasil lawsuits consolidated in the federal MDL has ruled that bellwether trials will involve plaintiffs who allege the HPV vaccine caused POTS (postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome) or primary ovarian failure (POF) / primary ovarian insufficiency (POI).
  • May 22, 2023

    Gardasil lawsuits are progressing in the federal MDL. As of this date, there are 86 cases in the Gardasil MDL, many of which were filed on behalf of our clients. We have 88 other Gardasil cases that have gone through Vaccine Court and are being worked up for filing in civil court. Over 100 cases are pending in Vaccine Court with 32 others that are being prepared to file.

    While the Gardasil MDL is where federal cases are consolidated, there are Gardasil cases filed in California state court as well. As of this date, seven are pending in California.

  • April 6, 2023

    We are pleased to report that the judge overseeing the federal Gardasil MDL in North Carolina recently ordered Merck to produce its entire database of Gardasil adverse events to attorneys representing women and men suing the company over Gardasil-induced autoimmune conditions. With the order, plaintiffs’ attorneys and their experts will have access to Merck’s adverse event database under a protective order.

    U.S. District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr. wrote in his order, “[p]laintiffs’ and their experts should have the same opportunity as Merck to review and analyze the entirety of the data.”

    “Gaining access to the entire Gardasil adverse event database enables expert scientists who have been demanding this information for years to finally research the patterns of complex autoimmune conditions, not just the sequestered view Merck had been imposing,” says Wisner Baum Gardasil lawyer, Michael L. Baum.

    Learn more in our press release.

  • March 14, 2023

    There are now approximately 65 cases currently part of the Gardasil MDL. Another 80 cases, which have already gone through the mandatory Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, are expected to be filed in the MDL in the coming year.

    At least 115 cases are currently pending in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), the majority of which are expected to end up in the MDL. Another 150 cases are under review, and new cases are coming in and being evaluated every day.

    Additionally, there are seven Gardasil cases pending in various California state courts.

  • October 11, 2022

    The federal judge who oversees the federal Gardasil multidistrict litigation (or Gardasil MDL) has appointed Wisner Baum senior shareholder Bijan Esfandiari to serve as co-lead counsel for the plaintiffs. Esfandiari is among four attorneys who will serve on the litigation leadership for plaintiffs throughout the country who allege in lawsuits against Merck that the Gardasil HPV vaccine causes severe side effects.

    The Gardasil lawyer team that will serve on the plaintiff’s leadership include:

    • Bijan Esfandiari – Wisner Baum
    • Rachel Lanier – The Lanier Law Firm
    • Paul Pennock – Morgan & Morgan
    • Allison Mullins – Turning Point Litigation (Liaison Counsel)

    "We are pleased that the judge appointed an alliance of proven litigators to represent Gardasil survivors," Gardasil lawyer Bijan Esfandiari said following a status conference. "We look forward to giving our clients the chance to finally be heard in court backed by a group of lawyers with proven success in high-stakes litigation. We will work together to seek justice for people who have seen their lives destroyed by a defective and dangerous product."

  • September 27, 2022

    Wisner Baum has filed the first Gardasil lawsuit to allege wrongful death in civil court. The firm’s attorneys filed the case on behalf of a couple from North Carolina who allege the Gardasil HPV vaccine killed their 13-year-old son. Clifton and Kelli Foley allege Merck “engaged in a relentless propaganda campaign aimed at frightening and guilting parents” who did not vaccinate their children with the HPV vaccine, and that the company refused to warn the public of the risk of serious side effects, according to the complaint. The Foley’s son, Noah, passed away at age 13 of encephalitis. The Gardasil lawsuit alleges Noah’s death stemmed from an autoimmune/autoinflammatory dysregulation process, which was caused-in-fact by the Gardasil shot received in 2018.

    Watch Video: 13-Year-Old Noah Foley’s Untimely Death After Gardasil

  • September 20, 2022

    Gardasil lawyers representing plaintiffs who suffer from serious health disorders after receiving the HPV vaccine filed a position statement today outlining the allegations they plan to pursue against Gardasil’s manufacturer, Merck & Co. Filed on behalf of plaintiffs who suffer from various injuries (most prominently, neurological, autonomic and autoimmune injuries, including Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome or Orthostatic Intolerance), the position statement alleges Merck failed to warn consumers about Gardasil's risks of inducing certain autoimmune and neurological injuries. The position statement further alleges Merck took steps to mask and downplay these risks.

    “Merck was also negligent in the way it conducted its clinical trials and post-marketing pharmacovigilance,” the position statement reads. “Plaintiffs further allege that, in its direct-to-consumer advertising to patients and parents, Merck misrepresented and overemphasized Gardasil's efficacy while concealing Gardasil's serious risks."

    You can read the position statement in its entirety here: Gardasil MDL Plaintiffs Position Statement

  • August 4, 2022

    The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) issued an order today consolidating Gardasil vaccine lawsuit claims before U.S. District Court Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr. of the Western District of North Carolina. With the establishment of the Gardasil MDL, "In re: Gardasil Products Liability Litigation MDL No. 3036," HPV vaccine cases can move into coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings.

    "We are very pleased the JPML decided to centralize the Gardasil litigation. Efficient coordination of the multidistrict litigation makes the most sense and gives the plaintiffs the best path for seeking and obtaining justice. Our clients are looking forward to getting their day in court." – Gardasil Attorney Bijan Esfandiari

    Judge Conrad has scheduled an initial conference for October 11, 2022 during which the parties and the Court will discuss “procedures that will facilitate the expeditious, economical, and just resolution of this litigation.” During the initial conference, scheduling, discovery, appointments of lead counsel and liaison counsel, a Plaintiff’s Steering Committee, and a plan for alternative dispute resolution, among other things, will be discussed.

gardasil Lawsuit FAQS

  • How Do I File a Gardasil Lawsuit?

    Choose an experienced attorney to represent you. The first thing you will need to do is choose an experienced Gardasil attorney to handle your case. Vaccine claims are complex, so hiring a law firm with a proven track record of success in litigating defective pharmaceutical product cases is a must. We have extensive experience in this field.

    We will help you file your claim with the Vaccine Court. Individuals who were harmed after receiving the Gardasil 4 or Gardasil 9 HPV vaccine must file a claim against the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), also known as “Vaccine Court.” The VICP provides compensation to individuals who file a claim and are found to have been injured by a VICP-covered vaccine (Gardasil is a covered vaccine). After filing a claim in vaccine court, however, it is possible to file a lawsuit in civil court against the manufacturer.

    If you do not get approved for a settlement or choose not to accept the settlement, we are prepared to file a lawsuit on your behalf in civil court. In the event the VICP court decides that, in its opinion, a petitioner has not been harmed by the VICP-covered vaccine and a settlement is not reached, the petitioner may file a Gardasil lawsuit in civil court to seek compensation for their injuries from the manufacturer. Rest assured, we will guide you to help you understand your options and help you determine what is the right next step for you.

  • Can I Sue the Doctor Who Gave Me the Gardasil Shot?

    The deception surrounding Gardasil applies to both consumers and the medical community alike. Merck & Co. manipulated people by “repeatedly stating, representing, urging and implying” that it was necessary for girls and young women to take the Gardasil vaccine to prevent cervical cancer, according to allegations in lawsuits filed in civil court. Doctors were also allegedly manipulated by Merck’s claims of safety and efficacy.

  • Is There a Gardasil Class Action?

    No. Wisner Baum represents individuals who were harmed by HPV vaccine side effects in personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits. Some individual lawsuits against Merck have been consolidated in a Gardasil multidistrict litigation (MDL) in North Carolina federal court, but these cases are not part of a Gardasil class action.

    Multidistrict litigation is a legal process that simplifies complex litigation involving numerous cases of individuals who have suffered harm from the same product or incident. Unlike class action lawsuits, which consolidate multiple plaintiffs into one case, an MDL involves grouping similar cases and hearing them in a single court. MDLs typically involve numerous personal injury cases related to physical injuries caused by a defective product, in this case, Gardasil.

    The primary aim of an MDL is to centralize civil lawsuits filed across the country that have common liability claims against the same defendant(s). The MDL process avoids duplication of discovery, and other legal proceedings, reducing the burden of federal district courts and improving efficiency. The MDL court ensures multiple plaintiffs' cases are handled fairly and effectively while protecting each individual's rights and ensuring justice is served.

  • What Autoimmune Disease is Involved in Gardasil Vaccine Lawsuit?

    The two main autoimmune side effects currently being prepared for trial in the Gardasil MDL are postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and premature ovarian failure (POF), also known as primary ovarian insufficiency. See the detailed list of alleged side effects.

  • Is Gardasil Dangerous?

    In a 2020 peer-reviewed study, Dr. Jørgensen and other researchers analyzed the available clinical trial data for all HPV vaccines, including Gardasil. The researchers found that the HPV vaccines were associated with a nearly two-fold increased risk of POTS. The study authors further reported that "HPV vaccines increased serious nervous disorders."

    One lawsuit alleged Gardasil contains "dangerous and undisclosed ingredients”. Gardasil contains various ingredients including amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate (AAHS), polysorbate 80, and other components that are capable of causing adverse reactions. See detailed information about Gardasil ingredients and their potential effects.

  • How Effective is Gardasil?

    Evidence that Gardasil prevents cancer is remarkably weak. Cervical cancer causes 1 death in 43,500 Americans, with a median age of cervical cancer diagnosis at 50. Merck tested Gardasil against lesions (CIN2 and CIN3), not cancer itself. Only a small fraction of these lesions ever progress to cancer. See detailed effectiveness information and statistics.

  • Can I Skip Vaccine Court and File a Gardasil Lawsuit Against Merck?

    No. Individuals may only file a Gardasil lawsuit against Merck if their VICP petition does not result in acceptable compensation. Because Gardasil is a covered vaccine, all claims must first go through petition under VICP (Vaccine Court). If your case is rejected, you may file a Gardasil lawsuit against Merck & Co. in civil court.

  • Can Vaccine Manufacturers Be Sued in Civil Court or Do They Have Immunity?

    The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act provides that an individual may bring a civil lawsuit under certain circumstances, and if such a lawsuit is in accordance with the provisions of the Act, including:

    1. File a petition with The United States Court of Federal Claims (Vaccine Court);
    2. Either wait the required 240 days for the petition to be resolved in Vaccine Court or await receipt of a Judgment from the Vaccine Court; and,
    3. Elect to opt-out from the Vaccine Court after the passage of 240 days, or reject the Judgment from the Vaccine Court and file a lawsuit in civil court directly against the vaccine manufacturer.
  • How Does Vaccine Court Work?

    1. An individual files a petition with the Court against HHS under the VICP. The Court sends both the Department of Justice (DOJ) and HHS notification of the petition.
    2. HHS reviews the petition and determines if the petitioner's claims meet its medical criteria for compensation. HHS then makes a preliminary recommendation to DOJ. HHS includes its position in a DOJ report, which is submitted to the Court.
    3. The report is presented to a court-appointed special master who decides whether the petitioner should be compensated. The petitioner may appeal the decision.
    4. If the special master does not allow for compensation, the petitioner may reject the decision of the Court (or withdraw their claims after certain timelines are met) and file a lawsuit against Merck & Co. in civil court. Wisner Baum will file this lawsuit on your behalf.
  • What is Vaccine Court?

    The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services created the VICP to compensate individuals and families of individuals who were injured by covered vaccines. Gardasil is one of many covered vaccines.

    Instead of filing a lawsuit against a vaccine maker in civil court, individuals who allege they were harmed by a covered vaccine file a petition for compensation against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Those who are eligible may recover compensation for vaccine injury-related medical and rehabilitative expenses, for pain and suffering, and lost earnings.

  • Is Your Firm Anti-Vax?

    Absolutely not. We believe that vaccines have the potential to eradicate disease and save millions of lives. We are, however, against intentional efforts to mislead consumers about the safety and effectiveness of a drug or vaccine. Our firm has always fought—and will continue to fight—for the rights of consumers to be fully and honestly informed about risks associated with any drug, vaccine, medical device, or consumer product. We will work tirelessly to ensure those rights are defended and victims of injustice are compensated for their injuries.

Contact Us Today

We’re Ready to Help

A member of our team will be in touch shortly to confirm your contact details or address questions you may have.

  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a response.
  • Please enter a response.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • Please enter a response.
  • Please enter a response.
  • Please enter a message.
  • Please enter a response.
  • Please enter a message.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your City.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please make a selection.
  • By submitting this form, I agree to receive SMS messages about my legal inquiry, including updates, reminders, and answers to my questions from Wisner Baum at the number provided. Message frequency may vary. Message and data rates may apply. Text HELP to 310-207-3233 for assistance. Reply STOP to unsubscribe. Privacy Policy

Client-Focused Representation

REVIEWS & TESTIMONIALS

We believe our track record speaks for itself. But you don’t have to take our word for it. See what our clients have to say about working with us.

    "I Can’t Imagine a Better Law Firm"

    Multiple lawyers recommended Wisner Baum to me and I have been consistently impressed with the quality of their work.

    - Best Law Firms Survey
    "They Are About Changing the Systems..."

    Wisner Baum are not only amazing attorneys but more importantly, they are activists. They are about changing the systems which got us into trouble in the first place. They understand their role in the process of making change.

    - Kim Witczak
    "Top Legal Minds in the Country"

    The Wisner Baum firm has some of the top legal minds in the country; they are driven, determined, trustworthy, ethical and passionate.

    - From Best Lawyers® Best Law Firms