No Fees Unless We Win
(310) 207-3233
Menu

Baby Foods Without Heavy Metals

In 2021, a Congressional report found that commercial baby food from several top brands in the United States was tainted with toxic heavy metals, including arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead. These heavy metals can have significant effects on development, brain function, and behavior. While heavy metals are naturally found in soil, water, and crops, it is alleged that the manufacturing process and poor industry practices may have resulted in higher levels. 

In this blog, we cover baby food brands that, as of March 2026, have demonstrated a commitment to transparency and safety when it comes to reducing heavy metals in their products.  

Consumer Safety Groups Identify the Safest Baby Food Brands

After multiple industry-leading baby food brands were found to have products with toxic levels of heavy metals and poor manufacturing processes, several states took action to require more transparency in the industry. California law now requires baby food manufacturers to publish test results for their products, providing more information to the public and enabling parents to make more informed decisions about what to feed their children. 

This data along with third-party testing, consumer safety reports, and independent databases have helped to identify brands which may have lower levels of heavy metals. While this does not guarantee safe consumption it does help provide parents with more information to make better-informed choices  when it comes to the food they feed their children. 

Square Baby

Square Baby is a dietitian-designed frozen baby food that is delivered to your home. The company offers a wide variety of pureed foods and has received numerous awards for their sustainable packaging, purity and testing. 

Third-party recognition of Square Baby:

It is important to note that Square Baby and other baby food brands named by third-party organizations as “safe” does not mean that they are completely free from heavy metals. Since these metals occur naturally in the environment, some ambient levels of these metals can still be found in the food. 

However, testing and reporting by the above-referenced organizations indicates that the levels are lower in these products when compared with some other companies.

Serenity Kids

Another brand that is regularly touted as having lower levels of heavy metals when compared with some popular baby food brands is Serenity Kids. The parent-founded brand of pouches has received multiple awards. 

Third-party recognition of Serenity Kids:

White Leaf Provisions

Family-run White Leaf Provisions has been recognized by several consumer interest groups for their regenerative farming practices. They have been Certified Biodynamic by Demeter and are Clean Label Project certified. According to Pretty Organic Girl, the brand is third-party tested for heavy metals.

Once Upon a Farm

Celebrity-backed baby food company Once Upon a Farm is USDA Certified Organic and Clean Label Verified, as reported by Pretty Organic Girl. The brand received recognition from Consumer Reports as one of the “Most Transparent Brands” and, according to the organization, voluntarily reports on products that are not covered by California’s new baby food transparency law. 

Little Spoon

The baby food brand, Little Spoon, is USDA Certified Organic and Non-GMO. It was also recognized by Better Goods as one of safer organic baby food products.

Which Baby Food Brands Are Under Scrutiny or Litigation

While the above-mentioned baby food brands have received recognition for their practices and lower heavy metal results, some baby food brands remain under scrutiny and are facing litigation. The 2021 Congressional Report as well as independent testing found that these major baby food brands reportedly had toxic levels of heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury. 

Brands identified in the 2021 Congressional Report include:

Other Ways to Reduce Heavy Metals in Your Child’s Diet

For decades, parents put trust into leading baby food brands believing the products to be safe. As the 2021 Congressional report and subsequent investigations revealed, many baby foods from some of the leading manufacturers contained elevated levels of heavy metals that may impact behavioral and neurological development in children.

Below are some helpful tips for avoiding heavy metals in baby foods.

Read Food Labels

Foremost, parents should read food labels to determine what ingredients are present in their child’s baby food. Some ingredients have been linked with a higher risk of certain heavy metals, including rice-based products, root vegetables (such as sweet potatoes), and fruit juices, as reported by the Cleveland Clinic

While parents can easily find alternatives to rice-based cereals and other baby foods, it may be more challenging (and not necessarily recommended) to replace all root vegetables. Instead, parents should offer a variety of foods to minimize exposure.

Breastfeeding

Breastfeeding is also a good way to reduce the risk associated with consuming heavy metals. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life and then with the introduction of other foods for two years or beyond as long as mutually desired by mother and baby. 

Replace Fruit Juice with Water

According to Healthy Babies Bright Futures, heavy metal exposure can be significantly reduced by replacing fruit juice with water. Tap water has 68% less toxic heavy metals than fruit juice, as indicated in the study. 

What to Do If You Suspect Heavy Metal Exposure

If you notice changes in your child’s behavior or development, and suspect that heavy metal exposure may have occurred, it is important to act fast. Contact your child’s pediatrician immediately to discuss options for testing, diagnosis, and treatment.

Be sure to document any symptoms, including the date they were first noticed and if they have worsened. Record and keep proof of baby food consumption, such as packaging information and product labels. These documents can help during a medical evaluation or in future litigation. 

Support for Families Harmed by Toxic Baby Foods

Parents are encouraged to stay vigilant and to do research on safe baby food brands or those with lower heavy metals. California state law now requires manufacturers to post test results on their websites. This information should be reviewed carefully to help make informed decisions on product safety. 

If you believe your child was harmed by a toxic baby food product, there is help available. The attorneys at Wisner Baum are industry leaders in toxic baby food litigation. We represent over 8,000 families in lawsuits against major baby food companies. Contact Wisner Baum today at (310) 207-3233 to schedule a free consultation or to receive information about how we can help.

Get Started
Call (310) 207-3233 or fill out the form below and request a free consultation.
20,000+ Families Represented

"Wisner Baum gave exceptional attention to all aspects of the case, detailed inquiry, and tenacious overview of all the information submitted. The paralegals are efficient and diligent. I was completely surprised to find an empathic personal message to take care of my own health during the challenging time of being a full-time caretaker.*"

Mary Flores
Reviewed
on Google
Read More Reviews
Case Results
We Demand Accountability.
More Successful Results
$2.0 Billion Verdict
Personal Injury
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case. The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case. The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
Continue Reading
$2.0 Billion Verdict
Personal Injury

In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case.

The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.

$289.2 Million Verdict
Personal Injury
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million. Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million. Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
Continue Reading
$289.2 Million Verdict
Personal Injury

$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial

Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million.

Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.

$265 Million Settlement
Fatal Train Crash
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
Continue Reading
$265 Million Settlement
Fatal Train Crash

In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.

Safe Baby Food Brands Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

While even brands that are deemed safe may still contain ambient levels of heavy metals, these products have received third-party recognition for their commitment to transparency and purity. Brands recognized by third parties as having lower levels of heavy metals include Once Upon a Farm, Little Spoon, Square Baby, Serenity Kids, and White Leaf Provisions.

According to Better Goods, Little Spoon is USDA Certified Organic and Non-GMO. It was recognized as one of the safer organic baby food products.

Many baby food products reportedly still contain considerable levels of heavy metals, but state laws like AB-899 help to provide more transparency. It requires public disclosure of heavy metal testing levels. 

While homemade baby food may still contain some level of certain heavy metals, making your own baby food can help to reduce exposure, along with breastfeeding, checking labels, and switching to water instead of fruit juice.

Even products labeled as safe may still have some level of heavy metals in them since the metals naturally occur in the environment. However, studies indicate that certain brands have lower levels of these metals and therefore may be safer for consumption. Any dietary concerns should be discussed with a pediatrician to ensure the health of your child. 

When companies choose profit over people, we fight. Wisner Baum exposes injustice, demands accountability, and delivers real results for real people. Your Path to Justice Starts Here.
Los Angeles
11111 Santa Monica
Blvd Suite 1750
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Get Directions
Bay Area
100 Drakes Landing Road
Suite 160
Greenbrae, CA 94904
Get Directions
Washington, D.C.
2101 L St NW 

Suite 800
Washington, DC 20037
Get Directions
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute a client relationship.
Send Us Your Case Details
We’ll respond and let you know the best way to proceed with your case.
crossarrow-up
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram