

Spinal cord injuries are among the most devastating injuries a person can suffer, often resulting in permanent disability, paralysis, and lifelong medical care. While many people associate spinal cord injuries with traumatic accidents, an increasing number of these catastrophic injuries are caused by defective medical devices, dangerous pharmaceuticals, and other harmful consumer products.
When manufacturers put profits over patient safety, the consequences can be devastating. Whether it is a defective spinal cord stimulator, a growing rod system, or a dangerous medication, those who suffer harm at a corporation’s negligence deserve justice and compensation for their suffering.
At Wisner Baum, our spinal cord product liability attorneys have extensive experience representing victims in complex mass tort litigation against pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers. We have a proven track record of holding corporations accountable when their products cause serious harm, including devastating spine injuries.
If you believe a harmful product caused your spinal cord injury, please call us today at (310) 207-3233 or fill out our free and confidential case evaluation form. Our spinal cord injury lawyers are here to help you pursue full and fair compensation for your losses.
A spinal cord injury occurs when there is damage to the spinal cord that results in a loss of function, sensation, or mobility. The spinal cord is a bundle of nerves that runs from the brain through the spinal column and serves as the primary communication pathway between the brain and the rest of the body.
When defective medical devices or dangerous pharmaceuticals damage the spinal cord—whether through direct trauma from malfunctioning implants, compression from drug-induced tumors, or other mechanisms—the results can be catastrophic and permanent.
Spinal cord injuries are classified as either complete or incomplete:
Complete spinal cord injury: There is no nerve communication below the injury site, resulting in total loss of sensation and motor function.
Incomplete spinal cord injury: Some nerve pathways remain intact, allowing partial sensation and/or movement below the injury.
The location of the injury on the spinal column determines the extent of paralysis and functional impairment:
Spinal cord injury victims often face a lifetime of secondary medical complications that require ongoing treatment and care. Some of the most common complications that arise following an injury to the spine include:
Paying for a spinal cord injury can be incredibly challenging. According to the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, lifetime costs for a spinal cord injury victim can range from approximately $2 million to $5.8 million or more, depending on the severity of the injury and the age at which it occurs.
These costs include:
When a defective product causes a severe back injury, the person suffering should not have to bear the financial burden; the manufacturer should be held responsible for these devastating costs.
Product liability refers to the legal responsibility manufacturers, distributors, and sellers bear in the event that their product causes injury to consumers. In spinal cord injury lawsuits involving defective products, victims may be able to pursue compensation based on several legal theories:
Unlike cases involving single incidents of negligence, product liability litigation often involves patterns of corporate misconduct affecting hundreds or thousands of victims. When multiple spinal cord injury lawsuits involve the same product, they may be consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) or pursued as a mass tort to enhance efficiency.
Several major litigations are currently underway involving products that allegedly caused spinal injuries and related complications. If you have been harmed by any of these products, you may be eligible to pursue compensation in a civil lawsuit.
Depo-Provera, an injectable contraceptive manufactured by Pfizer, has been linked to an increased risk of developing meningiomas, which are tumors that form in the protective membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord. When these tumors develop on or near the spinal cord, they can cause compression, leading to severe neurological damage, paralysis, and chronic pain.
A 2024 study published in The BMJ found that women who used Depo-Provera had an increased risk of developing meningiomas compared to women who did not use the medication. Despite this alarming connection, Pfizer allegedly knew about the risks for years but failed to adequately warn patients and healthcare providers.
A Depo-Provera multidistrict litigation (MDL) was established in the Northern District of Florida before Judge M. Casey Rodgers in February 2025. More than 1,200 cases are pending in the MDL, and in December 2025, the FDA approved a label change for Depo-Provera to include a warning about the meningioma risk. According to Depo-Provera lawyers, this change came decades too late for many women who developed these dangerous tumors.
You may qualify for a Depo-Provera lawsuit if you:
Spinal cord stimulators (SCS) are implantable medical devices designed to manage chronic pain by delivering electrical pulses to the spinal cord. While manufacturers have marketed these devices as safe alternatives to opioids, thousands of patients have suffered severe complications, including lead migration, electrical burns, nerve damage, and worsening pain that requires additional surgeries.
According to FDA data, the agency received more than 107,000 adverse event reports related to spinal cord stimulators between 2016 and 2020, including 497 reports of patient deaths. Major manufacturers, including Boston Scientific (formerly Advanced Bionics or Nalu), Medtronic, Abbott (formerly St. Jude), and Nevro Corp. face mounting lawsuits alleging that they failed to adequately warn patients of the serious risks associated with these devices.
Common complications associated with spinal cord stimulators include:
While no MDL has been established for spinal cord stimulator cases as of late 2025, attorneys are actively investigating claims against manufacturers and may seek to consolidate cases in the future.
Those who suffer a spine injury due to defective medical devices or dangerous pharmaceuticals may be entitled to substantial compensation for their injuries. In product liability litigation, each case is evaluated individually, meaning compensation is based on the specific harm each victim has suffered, even if the cases are consolidated into a mass tort.
Damages may include:
There is no one-size-fits-all settlement value for spinal cord injury cases. However, given the severity and permanent nature of these injuries, successful cases often result in substantial recoveries.
The following organizations provide comprehensive support, accurate and updated information, and direct assistance to individuals and families navigating life after a spine injury.
Christopher & Dana Reeve Foundation / National Paralysis Resource Center – The National Paralysis Resource Center offers free comprehensive information, peer mentoring, quality of life grants, and specialized programs. Their information specialists help individuals navigate life after paralysis, providing personalized plans covering rehabilitation expectations, equipment exchanges, and peer support networks. The Foundation publishes the free 392-page Paralysis Resource Guide in multiple languages and formats.
United Spinal Association – United Spinal offers a Resource Center staffed by experienced program specialists, nurses, and social workers (many with SCI themselves) who can answer questions about health and wellness, financial assistance, employment, rehabilitation, sports and recreation, and traveling with disabilities. The organization provides free membership, peer support groups nationwide, and has awarded grants to hundreds of individuals with SCI.
Model Systems Knowledge Translation Center – The MSKTC creates user-friendly, research-based resources for people living with spinal cord injury, summarizes research findings, and develops fact sheets using plain language. This center serves as an online gateway to resources developed by the SCI Model Systems programs.
Multiple organizations offer financial support for individuals with spinal cord injuries:
Kelly Brush Foundation – Provides grants for adaptive sports equipment like sit-skis and hand cycles.
Challenged Athletes Foundation – Offers grants for training, coaching, and adaptive equipment support.
Triumph Foundation – Helps cover gaps in insurance coverage through programs like the Keep Moving Forward Grant.
Wisner Baum is a nationally recognized law firm with decades of experience handling complex personal injury and wrongful death cases. Our attorneys have served in leadership positions in major mass tort litigations and have recovered billions of dollars for clients harmed by dangerous products.
We bring unique advantages to spinal cord injury cases:
If you or someone in your family suffered a spinal cord injury caused by a defective product, you may qualify for a lawsuit. Our experienced spinal cord injury attorneys are ready to evaluate your case at no cost and with no obligation. We will review your medical records, investigate the cause of your injury, and help you understand your legal options.
Call (310) 207-3233 or complete our online contact form to schedule your free consultation.
"Wisner Baum gave exceptional attention to all aspects of the case, detailed inquiry, and tenacious overview of all the information submitted. The paralegals are efficient and diligent. I was completely surprised to find an empathic personal message to take care of my own health during the challenging time of being a full-time caretaker.*"
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case.
The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial
Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million.
Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
In a class action, all plaintiffs are treated as a single group and typically receive the same settlement amount. In mass tort litigation, each plaintiff maintains an individual case, allowing for compensation based on the specific injuries and damages they have suffered. This distinction is important in spinal cord injury cases, where the severity of harm can vary significantly from person to person.
A multidistrict litigation (MDL) is a federal procedure that consolidates similar lawsuits from across the country before one judge for pretrial proceedings. This helps streamline discovery, avoid duplicative rulings, and promote efficiency. While the cases are consolidated, each person’s case remains individual.
Statutes of limitations vary by state and can range from one to several years. In product liability cases, the clock may start running from the date of injury or from the date you discovered (or could have discovered) that a defective product caused your injury. Because these deadlines are strict and missing them can bar your claim forever, it is critical to consult with a spine injury attorney as soon as possible.
People may discover that a medical device or pharmaceutical product has been recalled, which may lead to litigation against the manufacturer. The best way to determine whether or not a product caused you harm is to speak with an attorney who can review your medical records and look for any connection between the product and your injury.
At Wisner Baum, we handle spinal cord injury cases on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay no upfront legal fees—we only get paid if we successfully recover compensation for you. This approach allows victims to pursue justice without worrying about adding legal costs to their already overwhelming medical expenses.