No Fees Unless We Win
(310) 207-3233
Menu

NDMA in Zantac

Zantac and its generic active ingredient, ranitidine hcl, metabolizes into N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), a chemical that the FDA, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the World Health Organization (WHO) all classify as a (cancer-causing) carcinogen.

The FDA established a 96 ng (nanograms) per day intake limit of NDMA (though even this intake limit may be too high). However, recent testing of Zantac using FDA-approved methods found more than 2,500,000 ng of NDMA in a Zantac 150 mg tablet, the dosage countless people take every day.

IMPORTANT ZANTAC FDA UPDATE: On April 1, 2020, the FDA announced that it is requesting drug makers to immediately withdraw Zantac and generic ranitidine (Zantac OTC) drugs from the market. In its ongoing investigation, the FDA determined that N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in some Zantac drugs “increases over time and when stored at higher than room temperatures and may result in consumer exposure to unacceptable levels…”

What is NDMA?

N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) is a water-soluble organic (containing the element carbon) chemical that was discovered long ago in the process of developing rocket fuel. Its chemical formula is C2H6N2O. NDMA essentially consists of a nitrite group (NO2) attached chemically to a dimethylamine (DMA) group ((CH₃)₂NH). This fact is fundamental to the Zantac cancer connection that is discussed below.

NDMA is a yellow liquid with little or no obvious taste or odor. It can be produced as a byproduct of manufacturing processes, and humans can be exposed to NDMA in relatively small amounts through a variety of products, including tobacco, foods (cured meat, fish, cheese, beer), shampoos, cleansers, and pesticides.

NDMA Cancer Mechanism

Cancer is known to be the result of chronic exposure to carcinogens, leading to repeated DNA damage, which the body is unable to fully repair, and finally, to genetic mutations. The NDMA cancer mechanism has been studied extensively. When NDMA enters the body, the body’s own defense system is activated. The “army” sent to destroy foreign invaders consists, in part, of a family of enzymes (proteins) known as cytochrome P450. These enzymes engage the foreign substances in complex chemical reactions.

One of the CYP450 “soldiers”—the one that is thought to target NDMA—is an enzyme known as CYP2E1. As a result of the NDMA-CYP2E1 interaction and subsequent chemical reactions, the organic compound methyldiazonium ion (MI) is formed. MI is referred to in scientific literature as an “ultimate carcinogen,” meaning that it interacts directly with cellular DNA to initiate carcinogenesis. MI does this through a process known as DNA methylation, the addition of a methyl group to the DNA molecule. DNA methylation is a normal process that affects the expression of genes—that is, the activation or suppression of the genetic instructions to make a particular product, generally a protein. Abnormal methylation caused by NDMA, however, can lead to cancer.

Scientists are also gaining detailed knowledge of the biochemical mechanisms used by the body to repair NDMA DNA damage and how those mechanisms play a role in the progression towards cancer.

Zantac NDMA Cancer Risk

Over the last 40 years, several studies have made the case that NDMA is a carcinogen. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), “NDMA is clearly carcinogenic. There is overwhelming evidence that NDMA is mutagenic and clastogenic.”

NDMA belongs to a family of chemicals known as N-nitrosamines. According to the EPA, N-nitrosamines are “a family of potent carcinogens.”

Glaxo Laboratories (now GlaxoSmithKline, or simply GSK) developed Zantac (ranitidine hydrochloride), and it was first used commercially in 1981. In the years since, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Boehringer, and Sanofi have controlled the over-the-counter Zantac rights.

The interesting thing about NDMA and Zantac is that, contrary to the FDA’s assertion that NDMA is an impurity, NDMA is not added to Zantac; it is a byproduct of the chemical processes that happen when a person ingests ranitidine.

When Zantac interacts with stomach acid and heat in that environment, the molecule transforms into NDMA. That is why people who take Zantac are shown to have more than 400 times the legal allowable limit of NDMA in the urine. Put simply, NDMA is created during the process of digesting Zantac, which is why the Zantac cancer risk had not been discovered until recently.

Valisure Finds Unprecedented Levels of NDMA in Ranitidine Tablets

Online pharmacy company Valisure tests batches of drugs before they sell them to consumers. During its testing, Valisure found unprecedented levels of NDMA in Zantac and other ranitidine tablets.

“Every manufacturer and every type of Zantac or ranitidine that we’ve analyzed seems to have the same problem of the drug itself being very unstable and degrading, or even potentially reacting to, the condition in the human stomach to create NDMA.” – David Light, Valisure CEO

Valisure alerted the FDA to the issue in the summer of 2019, and the FDA issued a statement saying it would investigate the Zantac NDMA link to cancer. In April of 2020, the FDA issued a market withdrawal for Zantac, citing the results of its own testing and evaluation.

The Zantac lawyers at Wisner Baum believe the FDA’s decision to issue a Zantac market withdrawal is a necessary step toward protecting people from a dangerous drug. More can and should be done, however. Our firm has been calling for a Zantac recall since 2019 because there is no level of NDMA that is safe.

World Health Organization NDMA Zantac Investigation

The International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC), a unit of the World Health Organization, is the most recognized cancer research institution in the world. It brings together teams of scientists from multiple countries to investigate the cancer-causing potential of suspect chemicals and substances and publishes papers known as monographs to report the results.

After studying over 200 research papers on NDMA and the NDMA cancer risk, the IARC placed the chemical in the “Group 2A” category, meaning substances that are “probably carcinogenic to humans.” The agency found that NDMA is “carcinogenic in all animal species tested” and noted that the metabolism of NDMA by humans and animals is similar. NDMA was found to cause malignant tumor growth in multiple organs, in multiple species, by multiple routes of exposure (oral, inhalation, subcutaneous (under the skin), injections), with dose-response relationships appearing in several studies.

“N-nitrosodimethylamine should be regarded for practical purposes as if it were carcinogenic to humans.” – International Agency for Cancer Research, Monograph 17, available online here

International Agency Places NDMA in High-Risk Group

The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), which establishes shared regulatory guidelines for nations worldwide, places NDMA among those chemicals with the highest potential for damaging DNA and causing cancer. The council refers to these chemicals as the “cohort of concern” because they could be associated with cancer risk even at very low exposure levels.

Contact us or give us a call at (310) 207-3233 for a free Zantac case review.

Get Started
Call (310) 207-3233 or fill out the form below and request a free consultation.
20,000+ Families Represented

"Wisner Baum gave exceptional attention to all aspects of the case, detailed inquiry, and tenacious overview of all the information submitted. The paralegals are efficient and diligent. I was completely surprised to find an empathic personal message to take care of my own health during the challenging time of being a full-time caretaker.*"

Mary Flores
Reviewed
on Google
Read More Reviews
Case Results
We Demand Accountability.
More Successful Results
$2.0 Billion Verdict
Personal Injury
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case. The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case. The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
Continue Reading
$2.0 Billion Verdict
Personal Injury

In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case.

The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.

$289.2 Million Verdict
Personal Injury
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million. Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million. Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
Continue Reading
$289.2 Million Verdict
Personal Injury

$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial

Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million.

Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.

$265 Million Settlement
Fatal Train Crash
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
Continue Reading
$265 Million Settlement
Fatal Train Crash

In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.

When companies choose profit over people, we fight. Wisner Baum exposes injustice, demands accountability, and delivers real results for real people. Your Path to Justice Starts Here.
Los Angeles
11111 Santa Monica
Blvd Suite 1750
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Get Directions
Bay Area
100 Drakes Landing Road
Suite 160
Greenbrae, CA 94904
Get Directions
Washington, D.C.
2101 L St NW 

Suite 800
Washington, DC 20037
Get Directions
Los Angeles
11111 Santa Monica
Blvd Suite 1750
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Get Directions
Bay Area
100 Drakes Landing Road
Suite 160
Greenbrae, CA 94904
Get Directions
Washington, D.C.
2101 L St NW 

Suite 800
Washington, DC 20037
Get Directions
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute a client relationship.
Send Us Your Case Details
We’ll respond and let you know the best way to proceed with your case.
crossarrow-up linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram