No Fees Unless We Win
(310) 207-3233
Menu

Ozempic Lawsuit

Over 2,000 Ozempic lawsuits have been filed in federal court alleging gastroparesis, stomach paralysis, vomiting, ileus, gallbladder disease, and other gastrointestinal issues. The lawsuits allege Novo Nordisk, the manufacturer of Ozempic (semaglutide), made billions in sales by marketing Ozempic for weight loss and obesity but failed to adequately warn consumers about harmful side effects.   

Ozempic side effects lawsuits are for severe gastrointestinal issues like diarrhea, gastroparesis, and gastroenteritis. Potential payouts may include damages for past and future pain and suffering, health care costs, medical monitoring, and punitive damages against the company. Attorneys believe the Ozempic litigation will grow to include many thousands of claimants throughout the U.S.

If you or a member of your family received semaglutide injections for weight loss and experienced side effects like gastroparesis (stomach paralysis), persistent vomiting, nausea, or diarrhea, you may qualify for an Ozempic lawsuit. This litigation includes several widely-used weight loss drugs, including: 

  • Mounjaro (tirzepatide)
  • Wegovy (semaglutide injection)
  • Rybelsus (semaglutide tablet)
  • Saxenda (liraglutide)
  • Trulicity (dulaglutide)

At Wisner Baum, we offer free case evaluations for individuals  seeking justice and maximum compensation for life-altering Ozempic side effects. While the litigation is in the early stages (there have not yet been any Ozempic settlement agreements to date), time is of the essence to ensure your legal rights are protected. 

Ozempic Manufacturer: Novo Nordisk

Novo Nordisk is the maker of Ozempic, Wegovy, and Rybelsus. Despite the drug's widespread popularity for diabetes and weight loss, lawsuits allege the company failed to provide adequate warnings about serious risks.

Ozempic Side Effects & Health Problems: What to Look Out For

Serious side effects reported include:

  • Gastroparesis (delayed stomach emptying causing nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain)
  • Stomach paralysis
  • Persistent vomiting and diarrhea
  • Ileus and intestinal obstruction
  • Gallbladder disease and inflammation (cholecystitis, gallstones)
  • Severe vision problems such as nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), potentially leading to vision loss
  • Pancreatitis, pulmonary embolism, and other complications

Long-Term Effects and Concerns:
Research links long-term GLP-1 agonist use with increased risk of gallbladder and biliary diseases, and concern remains about other serious adverse reactions that patients may not be warned about.

Studies on Semaglutide

Association of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use With Risk of Gallbladder and Biliary Diseases

A meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the link between GLP-1-1 RA treatment and gallbladder and biliary diseases. Randomized clinical trials were utilized to compare the use of GLP-1 RA drugs with placebo or non-GLP-1 RA drugs in adults. The primary outcome measured was the composite of gallbladder or biliary diseases, while secondary outcomes included biliary diseases, biliary cancer, cholecystectomy, cholecystitis, and cholelithiasis.

The meta-analysis revealed that the use of GLP-1 RAs was associated with an increased risk of gallbladder or biliary diseases, especially when used at higher doses, for longer durations, and for weight loss.

Cholelithiasis in patients treated with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Researchers conducted a meta-analysis to examine the association between GLP1-RA and cholelithiasis. The results indicated a significant increased risk of cholelithiasis with the use of GLP-1 RAs when compared to placebo or active comparator.

Safety issues with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer and cholelithiasis): Data from randomized controlled trials

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety of GLP1-RA drugs in relation to pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, and cholelithiasis. The researchers concluded that GLP1-RA was safe for pancreatitis, but there was an increased risk of cholelithiasis associated with the use of these drugs.

Association of Bile Duct and Gallbladder Diseases With the Use of Incretin-Based Drugs in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

This comparative study aimed to determine if there was an increased risk of bile duct and gallbladder disease in patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 analogues. Out of more than 70,000 patients, 853 were hospitalized for bile duct and gallbladder disease. The study found that the use of GLP-1 analogues was associated with an elevated risk of these illnesses, as well as an increased risk of cholecystectomy. The researchers advised physicians to be cautious about prescribing these drugs due to the identified risks.

Ozempic for Weight Loss

While semaglutide was not initially approved for weight loss specifically, that did not stop Novo Nordisk from promoting Ozempic for weight loss, according to lawsuits. In 2018, Novo Nordisk launched a TV ad campaign stating that “adults lost on average up to 12 pounds” when taking Ozempic. The company spent approximately $884,000,000 over the next five years on television ads in the U.S. to promote semaglutide drugs with most of the spending allocated specifically to advertising Ozempic.

As a result of Novo Nordisk’s marketing, Ozempic prescriptions reached an all-time high of 373,000 in one week in February of 2023, more than half of which were new prescriptions. In June of 2023, new prescriptions for Ozempic surged by 140 percent from the previous year, according to media reports.

Ozempic even found its way into celebrity culture, with Jimmy Kimmel quipping about Ozempic and weight loss while hosting the 2023 Academy Awards. The TikTok hashtag #Ozempic had 273 million views on November 22, 2022. Months later, it reached well over one billion views. 

But Ozempic is linked to serious side effects that have devastated lives. Joanie Knight, a Louisiana woman in her 30s, told CNN: “I wish I never touched it. I wish I’d never heard of it in my life…This medicine made my life hell. So much hell. It has cost me money. It cost me a lot of stress; it cost me days and nights and trips with my family. It’s cost me a lot, and it’s not worth it. The price is too high.”

Brenda Allen, a woman in her 40s, was prescribed Wegovy for weight loss. “And even now, being off the medication for almost a year, I’m still having a lot of problems,” she said.

How to Determine Eligibility for an Ozempic Lawsuit

If you have taken Ozempic or another GLP-1 drug such as Wegovy, Rybelsus, Saxenda, Trulicity, or Mounjaro and developed serious side effects, you may be entitled to compensation. Wisner Baum is currently reviewing potential claims for individuals nationwide.

You may qualify if:

  • You can prove you used Ozempic or a related GLP-1 medication, such as through prescriptions, pharmacy records, or other documentation. (Use of compounded semaglutide injections from weight loss clinics without a prescription may not qualify.)
  • You were 75 years of age or younger when you began taking the medication.
  • You were diagnosed with a qualifying condition — most commonly gastroparesis (stomach paralysis), persistent vomiting, intestinal obstruction, ileus, or gastroenteritis — within approximately 60 days of starting the drug.
  • Medical records confirm your use and diagnosis, and in some cases, a healthcare provider can link your condition to the medication.

Individuals being treated for cancer or those with a history of major gastric surgeries (such as gastric sleeve, bypass, or banding) generally do not qualify.

If you are unsure whether you meet these requirements, contact our Ozempic lawsuit attorneys for a free case evaluation. We can review your medical history, prescriptions, and symptoms to determine whether you should pursue an individual Ozempic lawsuit or join the ongoing Ozempic litigation.

Understanding the Type of Lawsuit: MDL vs. Class Action

Although often called a “class action,” the Ozempic lawsuits are actually proceeding as a multidistrict litigation (MDL). An MDL consolidates individual cases with common issues for coordinated pretrial management but preserves each lawsuit’s individual status. This differs from a class action lawsuit, where one case represents all members as a single group. Knowing this helps clarify how your case will be managed and what you can expect in terms of participation and compensation.

How to File an Ozempic Lawsuit

If you suffered side effects after using Ozempic, you may be able to join the lawsuit against Novo Nordisk. To file an Ozempic lawsuit, you will need to take the following steps:

  1. Consult with an Attorney: The initial step in pursuing an Ozempic lawsuit is to consult with a qualified attorney. At Wisner Baum, our attorneys can assess the viability of your case after reviewing relevant information regarding your use of Ozempic, Wegovy, or Rybelsus, any adverse health effects experienced, and medical records.
  2. Determine Eligibility: Not everyone who has taken Ozempic, Wegovy, Saxenda, Trulicity, or Rybelsus will qualify for compensation through a lawsuit. The best way to find out if you are eligible is to contact our legal team for a free case evaluation. We will evaluate your case to determine if you meet the eligibility criteria for pursuing legal action.
  3. Gather Evidence: Evidence is necessary to substantiate your claim. As such, you must collect all relevant medical records, prescriptions, pharmacy receipts, and any documentation related to your health condition. Testimony from healthcare professionals or individuals who can attest to your experience may also strengthen your case. If you need assistance with this, we are here to help you. 
  4. Review Legal Requirements: Every legal case is subject to certain requirements and limitations. This includes the statute of limitations, which dictates the timeline within which a lawsuit must be filed. Because it is challenging to determine the statute of limitations that applies to a case, and because failing to file within the statutory timeline bars you from pursuing a claim, you should bring your potential Ozempic lawsuit to the attention of our lawyers as soon as possible. 
  5. File the Lawsuit: Once you and your attorney have gathered sufficient evidence and ensured compliance with legal requirements, the next step is to file the lawsuit. Your attorney will draft and submit the necessary documents to initiate legal proceedings. This marks the official beginning of your pursuit of compensation. 

Timeline: What Happens in an Ozempic Lawsuit?

Typical Steps and Timeframes

  1. Filing Complaints & MDL Consolidation: Most lawsuits are filed in federal courts and consolidated for pretrial proceedings (MDL No. 3094 in Eastern Pennsylvania).
  2. Fact Sheet Submission: Plaintiffs must submit detailed fact sheets outlining drug use and injuries.
  3. Discovery Phase: Both sides exchange documents, medical records, and expert reports over months or years.
  4. Bellwether Trials: Representative cases are selected and tried to help estimate damages and encourage settlements.
  5. Settlement Negotiations: Based on trial outcomes, parties may negotiate to resolve claims without further trials.
  6. Claims and Payouts: Compensation amounts are determined and distributed to qualifying claimants.

The entire process often takes several years, with milestones shaped by court rulings and scientific evidence evaluations.

Ozempic Lawsuit Settlement Amounts

Settlements in Ozempic lawsuits are determined by factors such as the extent of damages, strength of evidence, manufacturer's liability, and legal representation. People with Ozempic lawsuits have significant claims for damages due to the injuries they have suffered and the amount of medical care they have required and will require into the future. 

While there have not been any Ozempic settlement agreements yet in the litigation, this may change as the MDL progresses. Typically, in mass tort cases, both sides will await the results of at least one bellwether trial before settlement negotiations begin, though this is not always true. Bellwether trials determine how other similarly situated cases in the litigation will fare in the future.

To summarize, it is premature to speculate on Ozempic settlement amounts. Once a case has gone to trial, that is when we will have a better idea of where this litigation is going. 

Ozempic Lawsuit Update 2025

August 5, 2025: Last month saw a significant increase in Ozempic claims in the federal GLP-1 MDL. Attorneys say there are now 2,190 cases consolidated before Judge Karen S. Marston in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 

July 24, 2025: Ozempic vision loss lawsuits have been filed in various state courts after the European Medicines Agency (EMA) confirmed that semaglutide carries a rare but serious risk of causing nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION)

A lawsuit filed in New Jersey alleges a man became legally blind while taking Ozempic. Another Texas Ozempic lawsuit involves a woman who developed sudden, irreversible blindness after six months taking semaglutide. Both cases allege Novo Nordisk failed to warn about the risk of NAION. 

July 18, 2025: 1,997 cases are pending in the GLP-1 MDL, which includes lawsuits against Ozempic manufacturer Novo Nordisk. According to research from the Kaiser Family Foundation, 12% of Americans say they have taken a GLP-1 drug for weight loss, diabetes treatment, or to reduce the risk of heart attack or stroke. If approximately 40 million people have taken Ozempic and other GLP-1 drugs, this litigation is bound to grow exponentially.

June 2, 2025: Federally filed GLP-1 claims are closing in on 2,000. According to the most recent report from the JPML, there are now 1,882 injury claims in the GLP-1 MDL.

May 24, 2025: Multiple Ozempic vision loss lawsuits have been filed in state courts alleging NAION side effects. This segment of litigation is growing fast. 

Relatedly, a CDC study revealed that a staggering 25,000 semaglutide-related emergency room visits were reported in 2023. 

May 3, 2025: The GLP-1 MDL has grown to 1,809 cases. 

April 25, 2025: Ozempic lawyers filed a new lawsuit recently on behalf of a Maryland man who became legally blind after taking Ozempic (semaglutide). Todd Engel is the plaintiff in the case. He alleges Novo Nordisk failed to warn consumers about the risk of vision loss risks, citing a recent study that found semaglutide can increase the risk of NAION. The latest Ozempic lawsuit alleges the company prioritized profits over patient safety through aggressive marketing.

April 1, 2025: The MDL grew to 1,685 active lawsuits against GLP-1 drug manufacturers, including Novo Nordisk, the maker of Ozempic. Bellwether planning and critical pretrial motions are actively underway.

March 23, 2025: Plaintiffs in the GLP-1 MDL filed a detailed opposition to the defendants' motion to dismiss the litigation.

Attorneys emphasized that “Individual Plaintiffs should be entitled to litigate all of their claims,” and accused the defendants of improperly focusing on case-specific issues not meant for the dismissal process.

March 3, 2025: The federal judge overseeing the GLP-1 MDL, Judge Karen Spencer Marston, discussed important milestones for Ozempic lawsuits during a status conference. Attorneys say the short-form complaint process was outlined to streamline documentation for plaintiffs, and the Rule 702 hearing date is confirmed for May 14, 2025.

February 26, 2025: Semaglutide injury lawyers are investigating a link between Ozempic and vision loss. A study confirmed a 32% increased relative risk of Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), which is a loss of blood flow to the optic nerve. Researchers found that diabetes patients faced 4x increased NAION risk when using semaglutide, and weight loss patients showed an even higher 7x increased risk of this vision complication. Will there be vision loss lawsuits after this study? It is too soon to tell, but it is something that semaglutide attorneys will monitor. 

February 21, 2025: Ozempic has been removed from the FDA’s drug shortage list, where it had been since 2022. 

February 11, 2025: The GLP-1 RA Products Liability MDL has grown to 1,443 pending cases before Judge Karen S. Marston in Pennsylvania. After a slower December with 31 new filings, January saw a significant uptick with 110 new cases added to the litigation.

January 30, 2025: Defendant Novo Nordisk filed a motion to dismiss portions of the master complaint, though notably did not challenge the failure-to-warn claims, which are the foundation of this litigation. The motion seeks to narrow secondary claims, which could reduce the number of cases but likely will not have a significant impact on the litigation.

January 9, 2025: A crucial hearing has been scheduled for May 14, 2025, where the court will evaluate the admissibility of expert testimony on causation. What does this mean? Essentially, this will determine whether plaintiffs' expert opinions linking GLP-1 drugs to various injuries will be allowed to proceed.

December 3, 2024: GLP-1 drugs, including Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, and others, are implicated in over 1,200 lawsuits alleging serious health risks that drug makers allegedly knew about but failed to adequately warn of. The lawsuits claim these medications can cause dangerous side effects like stomach paralysis, intestinal problems, and other serious medical conditions. The legal cases have been consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in Pennsylvania, which means one judge will oversee all federal lawsuits. 

Last month, Ozempic lawyers filed a master complaint listing potential injuries for MDL cases, including: 

  • Aspiration of Gastric Contents
  • Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
  • Gallbladder Disease 
  • Gastroparesis 
  • Ischemic Bowel Necrotizing 
  • Micronutrient Deficiencies 
  • Pancreatitis 
  • Pulmonary Embolism 
  • Wernicke’s Encephalopathy 
  • The master complaint includes the following causes of action:
  • Breach of Warranty 
  • Failure to Warn 
  • Fraudulent Concealment/Fraud by Omission 
  • Fraudulent/Intentional Misrepresentation 
  • Innocent Misrepresentation/Marketing 
  • Loss of Consortium 
  • Negligence 
  • Negligent Design 
  • Negligent Marketing Misrepresentation 
  • Negligent Undertaking 
  • Strict Liability Design Defect 
  • Strict Product Liability Marketing Misrepresentation 
  • Unfair Trade Practices 
  • Wrongful Death

Legal experts expect the number of Ozempic lawsuits to reach tens of thousands as more people learn about the drug’s risks. The court will soon establish a process to review representative cases that could help determine potential settlements for affected patients.

October 3, 2024: Over 1,090 cases are pending in the GLP-1 Products Liability Litigation MDL. The litigation has more than doubled since the summer, and we believe more cases will continue to come in over the next few months.  

August 5, 2024: Ozempic claims in the GLP-1 MDL increased sharply last month to 346. A status conference will be held on Thursday, August 8, 2024.

July 26, 2024: Ozempic attorneys are investigating a recent study published in JAMA. The study found a link between semaglutide and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). NAION is a rare condition that may cause sudden and painless vision loss. 

July 15, 2024: The number of Ozempic lawsuits in the MDL increased to 105 total cases. We expect this number to increase in the coming months as a new order allows Ozempic lawyers to file complaints directly in the Ozempic MDL No. 3094. 

June 12, 2024: A new judge will oversee the GLP-1 MDL, which includes lawsuits against Ozempic, Mounjaro, and similar drugs for weight loss. U.S. District Judge Karen Marston was selected to manage the MDL after Judge Pratter passed away in May. 

As of this month, 101 lawsuits are in the MDL. Ozempic attorneys continue to prepare cases. We anticipate a significant influx in claims over the next few months. 

May 6, 2024: The Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs) Products Liability Litigation has reached 87 total cases. People with Ozempic lawsuits consolidated in the MDL allege they suffered from gastroparesis, intestinal blockage/obstruction, and ileus.

April 3, 2024: Ozempic lawyers recently participated in the first status conference in the Ozempic multidistrict litigation (MDL). Ozempic attorneys and the legal team for the drug’s manufacturer, Novo Nordisk, met for the case management conference in Pennsylvania, where dozens of Ozempic lawsuits are consolidated. 

Most of the lawsuits against Ozempic allege the drug causes gastroparesis, a medical condition that causes delayed stomach emptying. Gastroparesis can cause severe nausea, vomiting, and other symptoms. 

Are all Ozempic cases going to be in the MDL? Not necessarily. Ozempic lawyers are also filing cases in New Jersey state court, which is where Novo Nordisk has U.S. headquarters. 

February 4, 2024: The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) issued an order this week consolidating dozens of Ozempic side effect lawsuits. Consolidated cases will now be a part of MDL 3094 In Re: Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAS) Products Liability Litigation in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania before the Hon. Judge Gene E. K. Pratter. 

There was some question as to which drug makers would be involved in the litigation. Lawsuits have accused Novo Nordisk of failing to warn about dangerous side effects associated with Ozempic, Wegovy, and Rybelsus, Lawsuits have also named Eli Lilly based on similar allegations involving Trulicity and Mounjaro. All of the drugs belong to a class known as GLP-1 receptor agonists.

In the order, the JPML included both Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, the latter of which is facing the majority of claims as of this writing. Judge Pratter can separate the defendants should he deem it appropriate, but for now, both drug companies are parties in the MDL. 

In the coming weeks, we will know which Ozempic attorneys will serve on the plaintiffs’ leadership. Check back for more updates. 

January 25, 2024: Today, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) will hear arguments concerning plaintiffs' request to consolidate Ozempic lawsuits into a multidistrict litigation (MDL). Ozempic’s manufacturer, Novo Nordisk, has not objected to the application to consolidate cases, so we believe an MDL is likely. 

Two questions will need to be answered: 

  • Should drug manufacturer Ely Lilly be included in the litigation? Ely Lilly makes Mounjaro, which is a similar drug to Ozempic. Both are GLP-1 receptor agonists. Some legal professionals contend that maintaining separate cases would be preferable. 
  • Assuming an MDL is established, where will cases be consolidated? While the application proposes the Western District of Louisiana, California, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania are also possibilities.

January 2, 2024: As we look forward to 2024, we anticipate a decision on whether the court will establish a federal MDL for lawsuits against Ozempic and similar drugs. Check back for the latest news on the Ozempic lawsuits.

December 22, 2023: A plaintiff in Louisiana filed a lawsuit against pharmaceutical giants Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly & Co. The lawsuit alleges severe health complications, including vomiting and tooth loss, after taking Ozempic and Mounjaro.

Novo Nordisk and its subsidiaries are challenging the Louisiana court jurisdiction, arguing the complaint does not establish a connection between them and the state of Louisiana, nor does it include the plaintiff’s prescription history, marketing claims, or other allegations pertaining to the state of Louisiana.

The plaintiff seeks to consolidate Ozempic lawsuits filed in federal court into one multidistrict litigation (MDL). Scroll down to our previous update to learn more about what an MDL is.

December 18, 2023: Recently, a federal judge in Louisiana partially denied Novo Nordisk’s request to dismiss an Ozempic lawsuit filed by a woman who alleges the medication failed to warn about its side effects, particularly gastroparesis. While the judge dismissed breach of express warranty allegations, he allowed other claims to proceed. 

December 1, 2023: Plaintiffs filed a motion with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to consolidate all federal gastroparesis lawsuits related to Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, and similar GLP-1 receptor agonist drugs. A multidistrict litigation (MDL) shares some similarities with a class action, but they are legally distinct processes. In an MDL, individual lawsuits with common issues are consolidated for pretrial proceedings, discovery, gathering evidence, and more. But each case remains separate with unique claims for damages. This means that individuals within an MDL are not beholden to the resolution for an entire class, like a class action lawsuit. In a class action, each class member stands to gain the same resolution, with the exception of the class representatives, who may obtain a different resolution than the class for their additional duties in the litigation. As of today, there are 18 pending Ozempic lawsuits in federal courts. 

November 7, 2023: An Ozempic class action lawsuit has been filed against Novo Nordisk in Canada. The lawsuit alleges that the company failed to provide adequate warnings about the potential risk of gastroparesis caused by its drug Ozempic. Similar lawsuits have been filed in the U.S.

October 21, 2023: A study recently published in the Journal of the American Medical Association will likely encourage more people who suffered side effects after Ozempic to come forward and file lawsuits. The study found that individuals using popular weight loss medications like Ozempic or Wegovy may face an increased risk of serious gastrointestinal issues. Per the study, “the use of GLP-1 agonists for weight loss compared with use of bupropion-naltrexone was associated with increased risk of pancreatitis, gastroparesis, and bowel obstruction…”

September 27, 2023: Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) updated the Ozempic label to include information about an increased risk of ileus, a condition that obstructs the passage of food or fluid through the intestines. The agency has received over 8,000 adverse event reports related to Ozempic and Wegovy side effects.

August 5, 2023: The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and other agencies are currently investigating whether there is a connection between the use of certain diabetes and weight loss drugs, such as Ozempic, Wegovy, and other glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, and an increased risk of suicidal thoughts and self-harm.

While there is not currently any evidence suggesting a correlation between suicide and Ozempic use, the EMA investigation highlights the limited information on potential side effects associated with Wegovy and Ozempic.

Join the Ozempic Lawsuit

You may qualify for an Ozempic lawsuit if you:

  • Used Ozempic, Wegovy, or Rybelsus (any brand semaglutide medication)
  • Were diagnosed with gastrointestinal issues like gastroparesis (stomach paralysis), gastroenteritis, severe vomiting, nausea, or diarrhea

Attorneys allege the warning labels on Ozempic and other semaglutide medications were insufficient, putting consumers at risk of serious harm. Filing an Ozempic lawsuit allows you to seek justice and compensation for your injuries. It also sends a message to Novo Nordisk that putting profit above people comes at a price. 

Be advised: States have statutes of limitations that restrict how long you have to file an Ozempic case. Please contact Wisner Baum as soon as possible to ensure your legal rights are protected.

Ozempic Lawsuit FAQS

Have questions? We are here to help. Give us a call at (310) 207-3233.

Q: Can Ozempic cause gastroparesis even if I don’t have diabetes?

Yes. Lawsuits allege gastroparesis and other gastrointestinal injuries occur in patients using Ozempic for weight loss and diabetes alike.

Q: What if I switched from Ozempic to Mounjaro or Wegovy?

Lawsuits include related GLP-1 drugs like Wegovy and Mounjaro. You may still qualify depending on symptoms and timelines.

Q: What are the long-term side effects of Ozempic?

Long-term effects potentially include gastroparesis, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, and vision problems, among others.

Q: Can Ozempic cause vision loss?

There is evidence linking Ozempic to a rare eye condition called NAION that can cause vision loss. Lawsuits are ongoing.

Q: How do I know if Ozempic caused my stomach problems?

Diagnosis by a healthcare provider, medical records, and exclusion of other causes help establish a link. Your attorney can assist in gathering evidence.

Q: How do I join the Ozempic class action lawsuit?

Contact a qualified Ozempic attorney for a free evaluation to confirm eligibility and guide you through filing.

Q: Do I need to stop taking Ozempic to join the lawsuit?

No. You can file a claim regardless of current medication status. Consult your doctor about your health.

Q: Can I file a claim if I used Ozempic a year ago?

Possibly. Statutes of limitations vary by state but commonly allow 1–3 years from diagnosis or injury discovery.

Q: Who manufactures Ozempic? 

Novo Nordisk manufactures Ozempic, Wegovy, and Rybelsus, all GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Q: Is Ozempic still on the market?

Yes, Ozempic is currently available with updated safety warnings.

If you or a loved one has suffered serious side effects after using Ozempic or similar GLP-1 medications, the experienced prescription drug injury attorneys at Wisner Baum are here to help. Contact us today for a free and confidential case evaluation to understand your rights and options.

Get Started
Call (310) 207-3233 or fill out the form below and request a free consultation.
20,000+ Families Represented

"Wisner Baum gave exceptional attention to all aspects of the case, detailed inquiry, and tenacious overview of all the information submitted. The paralegals are efficient and diligent. I was completely surprised to find an empathic personal message to take care of my own health during the challenging time of being a full-time caretaker.*"

Mary Flores
Reviewed
on Google
Read More Reviews
Case Results
We Demand Accountability.
More Successful Results
$2.0 Billion Verdict
Personal Injury
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case. The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case. The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
Continue Reading
$2.0 Billion Verdict
Personal Injury

In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case.

The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.

$289.2 Million Verdict
Personal Injury
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million. Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million. Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
Continue Reading
$289.2 Million Verdict
Personal Injury

$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial

Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million.

Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.

$265 Million Settlement
Fatal Train Crash
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
Continue Reading
$265 Million Settlement
Fatal Train Crash

In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.

When companies choose profit over people, we fight. Wisner Baum exposes injustice, demands accountability, and delivers real results for real people. Your Path to Justice Starts Here.
Los Angeles
11111 Santa Monica
Blvd Suite 1750
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Get Directions
Bay Area
100 Drakes Landing Road
Suite 160
Greenbrae, CA 94904
Get Directions
Washington, D.C.
2101 L St NW 

Suite 800
Washington, DC 20037
Get Directions
Los Angeles
11111 Santa Monica
Blvd Suite 1750
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Get Directions
Bay Area
100 Drakes Landing Road
Suite 160
Greenbrae, CA 9490412
Get Directions
Washington, D.C.
2101 L St NW 

Suite 800
Washington, DC 20037
Get Directions
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute a client relationship.
Send Us Your Case Details
We’ll respond and let you know the best way to proceed with your case.
crossarrow-up linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram