No Fees Unless We Win
(310) 207-3233
Menu

Defective Medical Devices Injuries FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions About Defective Medical Device Lawsuits

If you’ve been injured by a defective medical device, Wisner Baum’s nationally recognized attorneys are here to help. With a proven track record in major product liability cases, our firm fights for patients’ rights and holds device manufacturers accountable.

FAQs

Symptoms vary by device but may include sudden or worsening pain near the implant site, swelling, infection signs, difficulty with movement, device malfunctions like irregular heartbeat (for cardiac devices), breathing issues (for respiratory devices), or symptoms caused by device fragments migrating within the body.

Immediately seek medical care to diagnose and document your injury. Preserve any device components if possible, gather all medical and financial records, and contact a qualified defective medical device attorney before discussing your case with insurers or manufacturers.

The time you have is governed by your state’s statute of limitations, which ranges from 1 to 6 years from the date of injury or when the injury was discovered. Because timelines for medical device claims differ and can be complex, it’s important to consult with a medical device attorney promptly to protect your rights.

Yes. Your device does not need to be officially recalled for you to file a lawsuit. However, proving liability can be more challenging without a recall, as you will need to show that the device was defective, caused your injury, and that the manufacturer knew or should have known about the problem but failed to warn the public.

Liability commonly falls on the device manufacturer but may also extend to component suppliers, distributors, and, in some cases, healthcare providers or hospitals if medical negligence contributed to the injury. Shared liability claims are possible depending on case specifics.

Critical evidence includes medical records showing diagnosis and treatment, documentation of the device type and implantation, reports or proof of device failure or defect, expert testimony linking the device defect to your injuries, and evidence that the manufacturer knew (or should have known) about the risk and failed to warn consumers.

While many medical device lawsuits are individual claims, some cases proceed as multidistrict litigation (MDL) or class actions, especially when large groups of patients are affected by the same defect. MDLs allow similar cases to be consolidated for pretrial proceedings but preserve individual claims.

Yes. Many lawsuits accept claimants who had revision or corrective surgeries years after the initial implantation, especially if the surgery was necessitated by device failure or complications related to the device defect. The key is proving the revision surgery resulted from the device problems.

Several types of medical devices have been recalled due to serious safety concerns. Examples include metal-on-metal hip implants that caused metallosis, transvaginal mesh linked to chronic pain and injury, CPAP machines recalled for toxic foam particles, and IVC filters that fractured or migrated causing life-threatening complications. These recall cases often involve Class I recalls—the most serious FDA recall classification.

The FDA’s 510(k) clearance process allows many medical devices to enter the market without full clinical trials if they are substantially equivalent to a previously approved device. While this speeds up device availability, it can also result in inadequate safety testing, allowing defective devices to reach patients. Many recalled devices—like certain hip implants and mesh products—were cleared this way, leading to major lawsuits.

Compensation depends on your injury severity, medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and whether punitive damages apply due to reckless corporate conduct. Settlements in hip implant lawsuits have ranged from $125,000 to $300,000 on average per claimant, but every case is unique.

Wisner Baum has recovered billions for clients harmed by defective medical devices. Our attorneys offer free consultations and only charge fees if we win your case. If you have questions or believe you were injured by a medical device, contact Wisner Baum—your case deserves the attention of a nationally respected injury law firm.

Mass Tort News LegalCast

LegalCast by Mass Tort News delivers insider access to the litigation shaping history. Hosted by Mark York and Elisa D’Amico, it features breaking updates, expert panels, and exclusive insights from leaders in mass torts, whistleblower cases, class actions, and more.
Watch the Podcast
Justice in Motion
Thoughts, insights, analysis, and perspective from the front lines of justice.
Read Our Blogs
In the Newsroom
Official updates, announcements, and case developments.
Read Press Releases
Spotlight on America

Hidden Hazards in Baby Food

Regulatory Failure Puts Children at Risk
Thousands of families are struggling after heavy metal–contaminated baby food sickened children across the country. Despite years of repeated warnings, neither the FDA nor Congress has taken meaningful action.
Watch the Full Story
One America News
Eaton Fire Lawsuit Against SoCal Edison
Victims Seek Accountability for Wildfire
The 2025 Eaton Fire destroyed thousands of structures and caused multiple deaths near Altadena. Evidence points to Southern California Edison’s equipment as the ignition source.
Watch the Full Story
When companies choose profit over people, we fight. Wisner Baum exposes injustice, demands accountability, and delivers real results for real people. Your Path to Justice Starts Here.
Los Angeles
11111 Santa Monica
Blvd Suite 1750
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Get Directions
Bay Area
100 Drakes Landing Road
Suite 160
Greenbrae, CA 94904
Get Directions
Washington, D.C.
2101 L St NW 

Suite 800
Washington, DC 20037
Get Directions
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute a client relationship.
Send Us Your Case Details
We’ll respond and let you know the best way to proceed with your case.
crosschevron-downarrow-up linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram