Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman changed its name to Wisner Baum in January 2023.

Gardasil Controversy FAQ

Gardasil Controversy FAQ

What is Behind the Gardasil Controversy?

With so many questions surrounding the Gardasil HPV vaccine litigation, we created the following FAQ page to help answer some of your questions.

If you still have questions or would like to speak with an experienced Gardasil lawyer about filing a claim, give us a call at (855) 948-5098 today or fill out our contact form.

What is Gardasil?

Gardasil is a vaccine now approved for use by adolescents, men and women between the ages of 9 and 45, to prevent sexually transmitted infection from several types of human papillomavirus (HPV). Certain types of HPV are associated with cervical cancer and Gardasil was heavily promoted as a necessary protection against cervical cancer. The vaccine later received FDA approval for protection against other cancers and diseases in males and females in the same age range.

There are over 200 types of HPV, each with a number. Gardasil was designed to protect against certain types of HPV. High-risk HPV is associated with potentially pre-cancerous cell growth on the cervix. Low-risk types pose little or no risk of cervical cancer, but they are associated with skin and genital warts.

Gardasil 4

Gardasil “quadrivalent,” or Gardasil 4, was designed to prevent infection from two of the high-risk HPV types (16 and 18) and two low-risk HPV types (6 and 11). The vaccine was initially approved for girls and women ages 9-26. The American Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended in 2007 that Gardasil become a routine vaccination for girls ages 11-12. The Gardasil 4 vaccine is no longer available in the U.S. It was replaced by Gardasil 9.

Gardasil 9

Gardasil 9 was designed to prevent infection from seven types of high-risk HPV (16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, 58) and two low-risk types (6 and 11). Since May 2017, it has been the only HPV vaccine available in the U.S. In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved expanded use of the Gardasil 9 vaccine to include individuals between the ages of 27 and 45.

Who Makes Gardasil?

Merck & Co. is the Gardasil manufacturer.

When Was Gardasil Approved?

The FDA approved the quadrivalent Gardasil 4 in 2006 after being fast-tracked for approval (the process only took six months). Gardasil 9 was approved in 2014.

Does HPV Cause Cancer?

More than 90% of new HPV infections, including those caused by high-risk HPV types, go away naturally in 1 to 2 years. Clearance of the infection usually occurs within 6 months. Even when HPV does not resolve and causes abnormal changes in cervical cells, those “lesions,” as they are called, rarely progress to cancer.

Gardasil Makes Good Vaccines Look Bad

There is currently a great deal of controversy surrounding vaccines. Our firm wishes to stress that we are not against vaccines. They have the potential to eradicate disease and save millions of lives. We are, however, against intentional efforts to mislead consumers about the safety and effectiveness of a drug or vaccine. We have always fought-- and will continue to fight-- for the rights of consumers to be fully and honestly informed about risks associated with any drug, vaccine, or medical device. We will work tirelessly to ensure those rights are defended and victims of injustice are compensated for their injuries.

How Do Vaccines Work?

When a virus attacks the body, the body’s immune system responds by creating antibodies – proteins that attach to the virus and mark it for destruction. Antibodies remain in the body even after the virus is destroyed. This means that, after the viral attack, the body has a “standing army” of antibodies ready to respond to the next attack.

Vaccines work by simulating a viral attack without actually causing one. This causes the body to create an army of antibodies even though there is no virus. Then, when the real virus appears, the body is prepared to eliminate the infection.

Is Gardasil Safe?

Each Gardasil shot contains ingredients in addition to the viral component (called adjuvants) that are capable of causing adverse reactions in their own right. They include:

  • Amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate (AAHS)
  • Polysorbate 80
  • Sodium borate (borax)
  • L-histidine
  • Genetically modified yeast protein
  • Undisclosed HPV DNA fragments

Adjuvants provoke immune system responses and increase the permeability of blood vessels. While some of the adjuvants are substances that appear in nature, it is important to keep in mind that these substances are being injected into the bloodstream, not simply being ingested or coming into contact with the skin, thus the potential for harm is intensified.

Is Gardasil Effective?

Evidence that Gardasil prevents cancer is remarkably weak. The target age for inoculation is between 11 to 12 years old, but the median age of death by cervical cancer is 58 in the US and the cervical cancer death rate is 2.3 per 100,000. It takes 15 to 30 years for infection with HPV to lead to cancer. With such a low death rate and the decades it takes for cancer to develop, it would take an impossibly large population of patients to reach any statistically significant result in a study to show whether Gardasil prevents cancer.

Cervical cancer causes 1 death in 43,500 Americans.

Median age of cervical cancer diagnosis: 50

[National Cancer Institute data]

Merck tested Gardasil against the development of lesions known as CIN2 and CIN3. CIN stands for “cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,” an abnormal growth of cells on the surface of the cervix. Only a small fraction of these lesions ever progress to cancer.

The authors of a 2008 study published in Lancet Oncology estimated that, for women who received adequate treatment, including treatment for recurrent disease, the 30-year risk of cervical cancer in women diagnosed with CIN3 was 0.7%. In other words, in 30 years, 7 out of 1,000 women with CIN3 would get cervical cancer.

Researchers at the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment in the Netherlands estimated that the median time from CIN2/3 to cervical cancer was 23.5 years, with only 1.6% of lesions progressing to cancer within the first 10 years. According to the Cleveland Clinic, treatment of CIN2 and CIN3 lesions is 90% successful and reduces the risk of cervical cancer by 95% for 8 years.) In short, with proper screening, cervical cancer is almost entirely preventable.

Can Gardasil Cause Cancer?

The Gardasil insert states, “Gardasil has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity or genotoxicity.”

Researchers have suggested that the elimination or suppression of certain high-risk HPV viruses may in fact open an ecological niche for even more dangerous HPV strains. In other words, it could open pathways to cancer that did not exist prior to vaccination.

Cervical Cancer Deaths v. Gardasil Deaths

Annual Deaths from Cervical Cancer in US for women of all ages: 2.3 out of 100,000

Death Rate in Gardasil Clinical Trials from all causes: 85 out of 100,000

[NCI, study evaluating 2011-15 data]

What is Behind the Gardasil Controversy?

The controversy surrounding Gardasil began during the vaccine’s clinical trials. It continued as the vaccine was fast-tracked for FDA approval in only six months. With a long list of side effects and thousands upon thousands of people reporting adverse events—including death—Gardasil is far more than controversial.

How Do I File a Gardasil Lawsuit?

Since Gardasil was fast-tracked for FDA approval in 2006, thousands of people from across the U.S. have submitted vaccine adverse reaction reports. For those who sustained a Gardasil injury, the first thing you should do is speak with an attorney with experience litigating these types of cases. Our firm is leading the Gardasil litigation.

Anyone who suffered an adverse reaction to the HPV vaccine Gardasil may seek compensation from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). All Gardasil claims must first be filed before the United States Court of Federal Claims Office of Special Masters, better known as the Vaccine Court. Unlike traditional lawsuits in civil court, cases involving covered vaccines must go through the Vaccine Court, which uses specialized rules and procedures. Our attorneys, in conjunction with experienced vaccine attorneys, are prepared to assist you in this process.

What is Vaccine Court?

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services created the VICP to compensate individuals and families of individuals who were injured by covered vaccines. Gardasil is one of many covered vaccines.

Instead of filing a lawsuit against a vaccine maker in civil court, individuals who allege they were harmed by a covered vaccine file a petition for compensation against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Those who are eligible may recover compensation for vaccine injury-related medical and rehabilitative expenses, for pain and suffering, and lost earnings.

How Does Vaccine Court Work?

  1. An individual files a petition with the Court against HHS under the VICP. The Court sends both the Department of Justice (DOJ) and HHS notification of the petition.
  1. HHS reviews the petition and determines if the petitioner’s claims meet its medical criteria for compensation. HHS then makes a preliminary recommendation to DOJ. HHS includes its position in a DOJ report, which is submitted to the Court.
  1. The report is presented to a court-appointed special master who decides whether the petitioner should be compensated. The petitioner may appeal the decision.
  1. If the special master does not allow for compensation, the petitioner may reject the decision of the Court (or withdraw their claims after certain timelines are met) and file a lawsuit against Merck & Co. in civil court. Wisner Baum will file this lawsuit on your behalf.

Can I Skip Vaccine Court and File a Gardasil Lawsuit Against Merck?

No. Individuals may only file a Gardasil lawsuit against Merck if their VICP petition does not result in acceptable compensation. Because Gardasil is a covered vaccine, all claims must first go through petition under VICP (Vaccine Court). If your case is rejected, you may file a Gardasil lawsuit against Merck & Co. in civil court.

Can I Sue the Doctor Who Gave Me the Gardasil Shot?

The deception surrounding Gardasil applies to both consumers and the medical community alike. Merck & Co. manipulated people by “repeatedly stating, representing, urging and implying” that it was necessary for girls and young women to take the Gardasil vaccine to prevent cervical cancer, according to allegations in lawsuits filed in civil court. Doctors were also allegedly manipulated by Merck’s claims of safety and efficacy.

Is Your Firm Anti-Vax?

Absolutely not. We believe that vaccines have the potential to eradicate disease and save millions of lives. We are, however, against intentional efforts to mislead consumers about the safety and effectiveness of a drug or vaccine. Our firm has always fought―and will continue to fight―for the rights of consumers to be fully and honestly informed about risks associated with any drug, vaccine, medical device, or consumer product. We will work tirelessly to ensure those rights are defended and victims of injustice are compensated for their injuries.

Attorneys Representing Victims Harmed by Gardasil Side Effects

When pharmaceutical companies put profits before consumer safety and regulators fail to correct bad conduct on the part of those companies, consumers have the right to address their grievances through the legal system. Sometimes it is only through litigation that the public discovers the full story behind a product’s harmful effects.

If you or someone in your family suffered adverse effects after receiving the Merck Gardasil vaccine, the attorneys at Wisner Baum would like the opportunity to hear your story in a free and confidential case consultation. Across all areas of practice, our firm has won more than $4 billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of our clients.

Call us today at (855) 948-5098 or fill out our contact form to learn more about pursuing a Gardasil claim.

  • Pharmaceutical Settlement $105 Million Settlement

    Wisner Baum obtained $105 million on behalf of multiple clients involved in a pharmaceutical negligence case.

  • Paxil Pediatric Class Action $63 Million Settlement

    $63 million pediatric class action re false promotion of Paxil. Judge approves final terms of improved national pediatric paxil class action settlement – consumers get a better deal.

  • Third-Party Payer Class Action $40 Million Settlement

    $40 million third-party payer class action re off-label promotion of Paxil. Judge approves $40 million settlement in the second phase of national pediatric paxil class action – insurance companies to be reimbursed.

  • Defective Drug Class Action $28 Million Settlement

    $28 million Paxil defective drug class action. A class action has been brought in the US territory of Puerto Rico against UK-based drug major GlaxoSmithKline.

  • Celexa-Lexapro Pediatric Class Action $10 Million Settlement

    $10 million pediatric class action re false promotion of Celexa and Lexapro. Babies born to women who have used Lexapro and other similar medications such as Zoloft, Celexa, Prozac, Paxil, and Symbyax are at an increased risk for birth defects.

  • Drug Injury $9 Million Settlement

    Wisner Baum obtained a $9 million settlement on behalf of an individual who was injured by a drug.

Contact Us

  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter the age of the patient.
  • Please enter the age of the patient.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter your symptoms.
  • Please enter the date your symptoms started.
  • Please enter the date of your medical diagnosis.
  • Please describe your experience.
  • Please enter the date you discovered that Guardasil caused these symptoms.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please enter your primary phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your city.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter your zip code.
    This isn't a valid zip cide.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Best Law Firms 2023
    Best Law Firms 2023

    A ranking in The U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” is widely regarded by both client and legal professionals as a significant honor. It is considered the most reliable, unbiased source of legal referrals anywhere.

  • The Truck Safety Coalition
    The Truck Safety Coalition

    Wisner Baum is proud to be a sponsor of The Truck Safety Coalition, a a group of caring individuals dedicated to reducing the number of deaths and injuries caused by truck-related crashes. Our support enables them to help families and save lives.

  • California Powerhouse
    California Powerhouse

    Law360 recognizes law firms that have a strong regional presence, working on important matters within their home state. “[Wisner Baum] possesses a David v. Goliath-sized slingshot while seeking justice for everyday citizens it believes were harmed or killed through corporate wrongdoing.”

  • Elite Trial Lawyers
    Elite Trial Lawyers

    NLJ and American Lawyer Media honor law firms and attorneys as Elite Trial Lawyers for their cutting-edge legal work on behalf of plaintiffs in practice areas ranging from mass torts to securities litigation.

  • Listed in Best Lawyers
    Listed in Best Lawyers

    Best Lawyers is the oldest and most respected peer-review publication in the legal profession. A listing in Best Lawyers is widely regarded by both clients and legal professionals as a significant honor, conferred on a lawyer by his or her peers.

  • AV Top Ranked Law Firm
    AV Top Ranked Law Firm

    Less than one-half of one percent of firms across the nation have achieved this ranking. A firm must have a high percentage of lawyers who have achieved the prestigious AV® Preeminent rating by Martindale-Hubbell®.

  • Verdicts Hall of Fame
    Verdicts Hall of Fame

    The National Law Journal inducted Wisner Baum into the Verdicts Hall of Fame for obtaining the $2 billion landmark verdict in the Roundup cancer case of Pilliod et al. v. Monsanto. The verdict was #1 in California and #2 in the U.S. in 2019 and is #9 in American history.

  • Super Lawyers
    Super Lawyers

    Super Lawyers is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high-degree of peer recognition and professional achievement.

  • National Trial Lawyers Top 100
    National Trial Lawyers Top 100

    The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 recognized the law firms of Wisner Baum, the Miller Firm and Audet & Partners with the 2019 Trial Team of the Year award (in the Mass Torts category) for their work in the groundbreaking case of Dewayne “Lee” Johnson v. Monsanto Company.

  • AV Preeminent Peer Review Rated
    AV Preeminent Peer Review Rated

    An AV® rating reflects an attorney who has reached the heights of professional excellence. The rating signifies the highest legal ability, and very high adherence to professional standards of conduct, ethics, reliability, and diligence.

  • Avvo 10.0 Rating
    Avvo 10.0 Rating

    Wisner Baum is proud to have all of its lawyers listed in Avvo, a legal directory connecting people in need of legal services with lawyers and connecting lawyers to lawyers. Eight of our attorneys have earned a 10.0 perfect rating with Avvo.

  • Top Jury Verdict in <br> CA and USA
    Top Jury Verdict in
    CA and USA

    TopVerdict.com ranks our $2 billion verdict in Pilliod et al. v. Monsanto as the biggest verdict in California and the second largest verdict in the U.S. in 2019. It is the ninth largest verdict in U.S. history.

  • Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers
    Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers

    Published annually, the Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers list recognizes the “best of the best” in this area of the law through nominations, research, and review by a board of their peers.

  • Product Liability Practice Group of the Year
    Product Liability Practice Group of the Year

    In 2020, Law360 honored the law firms ”behind the litigation wins and major deals that resonated throughout the legal industry.” It recognized our success in several landmark cases.

  • Top Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California
    Top Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California

    In 2018, our $289 million Johnson v. Monsanto verdict was the largest personal injury verdict in California. TopVerdict.com also ranked it #2 among all verdicts in California and #10 in the nation.

  • Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers
    Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers

    The Bar Register is the definitive guide to the most distinguished law firms in America. It includes only those select law practices that have earned the highest rating in the Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory and have been designated by their colleagues as preeminent in their field.

/

Firm Reviews

What Our Clients Are Saying
  • I Can’t Imagine a Better Law Firm

    “Multiple lawyers recommended Wisner Baum to me and I have been consistently impressed with the quality of their work.”

    - Best Law Firms Survey
  • They Are About Changing the Systems...

    “Wisner Baum are not only amazing attorneys but more importantly, they are activists. They are about changing the systems which got us into trouble in the first place. They understand their role in the process of making change.”

    - Kim Witczak
  • Top Legal Minds in the Country

    “The Wisner Baum firm has some of the top legal minds in the country; they are driven, determined, trustworthy, ethical and passionate.”

    - From Best Lawyers® Best Law Firms
  • Diligent & Professional Representation

    “Thanks to your efforts I was able to recover from a tragic experience and turn my life around for the best.”

    - W.T.
  • Our Best Interest Was Always Number One on Your List

    “A special thank you to your Spanish-speaking staff for the extra effort put into this case. The language barrier was never a problem, and we are so very thankful to them. Your name holds much respect in our family.”

    - G.C. & C.C
/