Government Healthcare Fraud
Healthcare fraud against the government occurs when an individual or corporation files a claim to obtain reimbursement from government healthcare programs for products or services based on false claims. The two government health care programs most vulnerable to fraud and abuse are Medicare, which serves people who are 65 or older, and Medicaid, which covers individuals with limited resources.
Tricare, a government program that provides military personnel with civilian healthcare benefits, is also susceptible to false claims and fraudulent activity. Tricare enrollment is open to active service members and their families, National Guard and Reserve members, and retirees. The United States Department of Defense Military Health System administers Tricare, although the government has contracts with several large private insurance corporations to provide claims processing, administrative functions and customer service.
Wisner Baum Announces that NeuroScience/ Pharmasan Labs Pays $8.5 Million to Settle Whistleblower Laawsuit
Types of Healthcare Fraud Schemes
Healthcare fraud can be found in all parts of the nation’s healthcare system, including medical clinics, hospitals, nursing homes, residential care facilities, and home healthcare companies.
Some of the most common schemes used to defraud government healthcare programs include:
- Billing for products or services that were never provided.
- Billing for medically unnecessary services.
- Billing for excessive services, e.g., daily medical office visits when a few times monthly would be sufficient.
Overcharging for the goods and services that were provided. Two of the most common schemes are:
- Upcoding of services or supplies: Each medical procedure has a corresponding billing code attached to it. A criminal provider might submit a bill using a procedure code that will give them a higher payment instead of the actual code for the service provided, for example, using a code for individual therapy, when group therapy was provided. Upcoding may also apply to supplies – e.g., billing for more expensive items when cheaper ones were provided.
- Unbundling: This involves submitting separate bills for tests or procedures that were performed at the same time and should have been billed together at a reduced cost.
- Paying kickbacks in exchange for the referral of patients for health care services.
- Durable Medical Equipment (DME) fraud: Wheelchairs, catheters, and home oxygen or insulin pumps are examples of the many types of DME. Schemes include upcoding and unbundling (submitting multiple bills for component parts), billing for more expensive items than were actually provided, shipping DME without proper medical authorization, shipping DME that was never ordered, and failing to credit Medicare for returned items.
Healthcare Fraud Whistleblower
Healthcare fraud is prosecutable under the False Claims Act (FCA), which rewards and protects whistleblowers who file whistleblower (qui tam) lawsuits against fraudulent providers.
Some of the following healthcare fraud settlements illustrate the important role that whistleblowers and the FCA play in exposing fraud:
- North Atlantic Medical Services Inc. (NAMS), a Massachusetts company, agreed to pay $852,378 to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by submitting claims to Medicare and Medicaid for respiratory services provided by unlicensed personnel. The government investigation was triggered by a whistleblower lawsuit filed under the FCA by two former NAMS employees. They will split a whistleblower award of $153,428
- The DOJ announced that the former chief operating officer of a Miami-area psychiatric hospital pleaded guilty to submitting more than $67 million in fraudulent claims to Medicare for inpatient and outpatient mental health services that were not medically necessary. The hospital obtained Medicare patients by paying bribes and kickbacks to patient brokers.
- DaVita Healthcare Partners, Inc., a company that operates dialysis clinics in 46 states and the District of Columbia, paid $350 million to resolve claims that it violated the False Claims Act by paying kickbacks to physicians for referring patients to its clinics. Such payments have been made illegal to ensure that health care decisions are based only on the medical needs and interests of the patient, not financial gain for the doctor. Here again, the charges were originally brought in a qui tamlawsuit filed by a whistleblower, a senior financial analyst with the company.
- Dignity Health, one of the largest hospital systems in the nation, agreed to pay $37 million to settle charges that 13 of its hospitals in California, Nevada and Arizona knowingly submitted false claims to Medicare and Tricare by admitting patients who could have been treated on a less costly, outpatient basis. The settlement resolved a lawsuit brought by a whistleblower who was a former Dignity employee under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act (FCA). She will receive a whistleblower award of approximately $6.25 million.
Using the False Claims Act to Fight Healthcare Fraud
Individuals who have knowledge of fraudulent practices in the healthcare industry can take action on behalf of the U.S. government by filing a whistleblower lawsuit. The FCA allows a healthcare fraud whistleblower to file what is known as a qui tamlawsuit against an individual or business that is engaged in fraud against the government.
The Department of Justice, which prosecutes FCA actions, is notified of the lawsuit and may at some point decide to intervene in the case. If the action results in a successful enforcement action, the whistleblower may receive 15 percent to 25 percent of the amount recovered.
It is important that anyone seeking to file a qui tam lawsuit receive expert legal assistance. An experienced whistleblower attorney can protect your rights, give you the best chance of a successful outcome and ensure that FCA rules are followed to maximize any award.
If you have knowledge of healthcare fraud and are considering taking action, please contact the Wisner Baum whistleblower attorneys today for a free case consultation.
Whistleblower Settlement $18 Million Settlement
Wisner Baum secured an $18 million settlement against the Boeing Company for overcharging the U.S. government on aircraft maintenance.
Whistleblower Settlement $8.5 Million Settlement
Wisner Baum secured an $8.5 million whistleblower settlement against Neuroscience/ Pharmasan Labs for improper billing over unnecessary or questionable tests.
Whistleblower Settlement $8.45 Million Settlement
Wisner Baum obtained an $8.45 million settlement against MB2 Dental Solutions for improper billing and kickbacks.
Whistleblower Settlement $6.5 Million Settlement
Wisner Baum obtained a $6.5 million settlement against San Diego Hospice for healthcare fraud.
Whistleblower Settlement $1.2 Million Settlement
Wisner Baum secured a $1.2 million settlement against Bizlink Technology for underpaying custom fees.
Whistleblower Settlement $1.3 Million Settlement
Wisner Baum secured a $1.3 million Whistleblower settlement against West Alabama Emergency Physicians for medicare fraud.
A ranking in The U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” is widely regarded by both client and legal professionals as a significant honor. It is considered the most reliable, unbiased source of legal referrals anywhere.
Wisner Baum is proud to be a sponsor of The Truck Safety Coalition, a a group of caring individuals dedicated to reducing the number of deaths and injuries caused by truck-related crashes. Our support enables them to help families and save lives.
Law360 recognizes law firms that have a strong regional presence, working on important matters within their home state. “[Wisner Baum] possesses a David v. Goliath-sized slingshot while seeking justice for everyday citizens it believes were harmed or killed through corporate wrongdoing.”
NLJ and American Lawyer Media honor law firms and attorneys as Elite Trial Lawyers for their cutting-edge legal work on behalf of plaintiffs in practice areas ranging from mass torts to securities litigation.
Best Lawyers is the oldest and most respected peer-review publication in the legal profession. A listing in Best Lawyers is widely regarded by both clients and legal professionals as a significant honor, conferred on a lawyer by his or her peers.
Less than one-half of one percent of firms across the nation have achieved this ranking. A firm must have a high percentage of lawyers who have achieved the prestigious AV® Preeminent rating by Martindale-Hubbell®.
The National Law Journal inducted Wisner Baum into the Verdicts Hall of Fame for obtaining the $2 billion landmark verdict in the Roundup cancer case of Pilliod et al. v. Monsanto. The verdict was #1 in California and #2 in the U.S. in 2019 and is #9 in American history.
Super Lawyers is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high-degree of peer recognition and professional achievement.
The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 recognized the law firms of Wisner Baum, the Miller Firm and Audet & Partners with the 2019 Trial Team of the Year award (in the Mass Torts category) for their work in the groundbreaking case of Dewayne “Lee” Johnson v. Monsanto Company.
An AV® rating reflects an attorney who has reached the heights of professional excellence. The rating signifies the highest legal ability, and very high adherence to professional standards of conduct, ethics, reliability, and diligence.
Wisner Baum is proud to have all of its lawyers listed in Avvo, a legal directory connecting people in need of legal services with lawyers and connecting lawyers to lawyers. Eight of our attorneys have earned a 10.0 perfect rating with Avvo.
CA and USA
TopVerdict.com ranks our $2 billion verdict in Pilliod et al. v. Monsanto as the biggest verdict in California and the second largest verdict in the U.S. in 2019. It is the ninth largest verdict in U.S. history.
Published annually, the Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers list recognizes the “best of the best” in this area of the law through nominations, research, and review by a board of their peers.
In 2020, Law360 honored the law firms ”behind the litigation wins and major deals that resonated throughout the legal industry.” It recognized our success in several landmark cases.
In 2018, our $289 million Johnson v. Monsanto verdict was the largest personal injury verdict in California. TopVerdict.com also ranked it #2 among all verdicts in California and #10 in the nation.
The Bar Register is the definitive guide to the most distinguished law firms in America. It includes only those select law practices that have earned the highest rating in the Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory and have been designated by their colleagues as preeminent in their field.
Firm ReviewsWhat Our Clients Are Saying
I Can’t Imagine a Better Law Firm- Best Law Firms Survey
They Are About Changing the Systems...- Kim Witczak
Top Legal Minds in the Country- From Best Lawyers® Best Law Firms
Diligent & Professional Representation- W.T.
Our Best Interest Was Always Number One on Your List- G.C. & C.C