No Fees Unless We Win
(310) 207-3233
Menu

Where is Glyphosate Banned?

Numerous cities, counties, states and countries throughout the world have taken steps to either restrict or ban glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup weed killer.

The following countries have issued outright bans on glyphosate, imposed restrictions or have issued statements of intention to ban or restrict glyphosate-based herbicides, including Roundup, over health concerns and the evidence uncovered in the Roundup cancer litigation proving the weed killer’s link to cancer:

The following boroughs and townships have issued bans or restrictions on pesticides and herbicides, including glyphosate:

Is Glyphosate Banned in Europe?

As you can see above, some individual countries have introduced legislation to ban or restrict private sales of glyphosate, or restrictions on spraying glyphosate in public spaces. As for the whole of the European Union (EU), glyphosate is not currently banned.

In December of 2022, the European Commission extended glyphosate's authorization for one year, to December 15, 2023, while the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) completed its assessment. 

In November 2023, the European Commission renewed glyphosate's approval for 10 years, until December 15, 2033, despite not receiving a qualified majority vote from EU member states — Austria, Luxembourg, and Croatia voted against, and Germany and several others abstained. A coalition of NGOs has filed a legal challenge to the re-approval in the EU's Court of Justice, and the case is currently pending.

Is Glyphosate Banned in the United States?

Federal Status

Glyphosate is not banned in the United States. The herbicide remains registered by the EPA for both agricultural and residential use, though significant legal and regulatory challenges are ongoing.

EPA Registration Review

The EPA is currently conducting a comprehensive registration review of glyphosate, a process required every 15 years for all pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). In June 2022, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated portions of EPA's 2020 Interim Registration Review Decision, finding that EPA failed to adequately assess glyphosate's potential risks to human health and the environment, including endangered species impacts.

In response, EPA formally withdrew its Interim Decision in September 2022. Glyphosate products remain on the market and continue to be used according to existing label directions. EPA's final registration review is expected by October 2026.

Bayer's Residential Product Changes

In July 2021, Bayer announced it would stop selling glyphosate-based Roundup products for the U.S. residential lawn and garden market. Bayer completed this transition in 2023, replacing glyphosate with alternative active ingredients in residential formulations sold at retail stores. This decision was driven by litigation concerns rather than regulatory action. Glyphosate-based Roundup products remain available for commercial agricultural use in the U.S. and for both residential and commercial use internationally.

Supreme Court Review

On January 16, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear Monsanto Company v. Durnell, a case that could determine whether federal pesticide law (FIFRA) preempts state failure-to-warn claims against Bayer in Roundup cancer lawsuits. Oral arguments are scheduled for April 22, 2026.

The case arises from a Missouri trial in which a jury awarded $1.25 million to John Durnell, a longtime Roundup user who developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Monsanto argues that because EPA has not required a cancer warning on glyphosate product labels, federal law preempts state-law claims requiring such warnings. The Trump administration has filed a brief supporting Bayer's position, reversing the Biden administration's stance. A ruling in Monsanto's favor could significantly impact approximately 181,000 pending Roundup claims.

Is Glyphosate Banned in California?

Glyphosate is not banned in California. However, the state has taken regulatory action through Proposition 65, and the University of California system has suspended its use.

Proposition 65 Listing

On July 7, 2017, California added glyphosate to the state's Proposition 65 list of chemicals known to cause cancer, based on the International Agency for Research on Cancer's (IARC) 2015 classification of glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic to humans."

However, a federal court permanently enjoined enforcement of the Prop 65 warning requirement for glyphosate in June 2020, ruling that requiring companies to display cancer warnings violated their First Amendment rights. The court found that the warning would be misleading because the scientific consensus—aside from the IARC classification—did not support labeling glyphosate as a known carcinogen. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld this ruling in 2023.

As a result, while glyphosate remains on California's Prop 65 list, businesses are not required to provide Prop 65 cancer warnings on products containing glyphosate.

University of California System

In May 2019, University of California President Janet Napolitano suspended the use of glyphosate-based herbicides on all 10 UC campuses, effective June 1, 2019. The suspension was implemented due to concerns about legal and reputational risks, as well as possible human health and ecological hazards.

The suspension includes four specific exceptions:

  • Agricultural operations
  • Fuel-load management programs to reduce wildfire risk
  • Native habitat preservation or restoration activities
  • Research that requires glyphosate-based herbicides

The suspension remains in effect, and a UC Herbicide Task Force was formed to provide long-term guidance on pesticide use across the UC system.

U.S. Cities to Restrict or Ban Glyphosate

For California cities and counties with glyphosate restrictions, see the U.S. Local Jurisdictions section below.

Alaska

  • Anchorage, Alaska – Passed an ordinance that establishes pesticide-free policies and restrictions for city parks, public lands, and other property.
  • Skagway, Alaska – Signed an ordinance that prohibits the sale and use of persistent herbicides (including glyphosate) on public and private property.

Arizona

California

Colorado

Connecticut

A growing number of Connecticut towns, including Branford, Cheshire, Granby, Essex, Greenwich, Manchester, OxfordPine Grove, Plainville, Roxbury, Watertown, and Woodbridge have adopted bans or restrictions on glyphosate use. The state also has Public Act 09-56 to eliminate the use of pesticides in K-8 schools.

Florida

Hawaii

In 2018, several bills that would have regulated pesticides, including glyphosate, advanced in the Hawaii legislature but did not become law. 

  • Hawaii County, Hawaii – A Hawaii County Council committee approved a bill that would prohibit the use of herbicides like Roundup on public parks, roads, bike routes, trails, sidewalks, and elsewhere. The bill passed in December of 2021.

Illinois

Iowa

Kansas

Maine

In March of 2021, Maine lawmakers proposed a ban on aerial glyphosate spraying in the state’s forests. Democratic Senate President Troy Jackson presented the bill, noting “aerial herbicides in the Maine woods benefits the bottom line of large landowners at the expense and well-being of the people living and working in the region.” Months later, Governor Janet Mills vetoed the bill.

Dozens of cities and townships in Maine have adopted local ordinances restricting or banning pesticides and herbicides.

Maryland

  • Baltimore, Maryland – The city council voted to restrict three toxic pesticides, including glyphosate. The new regulation took effect in July of 2022.
  • Greenbelt, Maryland – Adopted Sustainable Land Care policy for public lands calling for limited use of pesticides.
  • Howard County, Maryland – Implemented a least-toxic IPM policy and accompanying legislation for county grounds maintenance in November of 2019.
  • Hyattsville, Maryland – Passed ordinance prohibiting the use of toxic pesticides on public property in favor of alternative, organic methods
  • Montgomery County, Maryland – County Council voted to ban the use of cosmetic pesticides on private lawns. In December 2018, Montgomery County Parks announced that it would discontinue the use of glyphosate in parks.
  • Takoma Park, Maryland – Placed restriction on cosmetic pesticides for lawn care on public and private property.

Massachusetts

Michigan

On April 21, 2021, several Michigan State Senators introduced a bill that would ban the residential use of glyphosate on grass, flower beds, and other ground cover. The bill did not advance out of committee.

Minnesota

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Mexico

New Jersey

New Jersey has State and local ordinances encouraging Integrated Pest Management programs to eliminate or drastically reduce the use of pesticides. At least 15 city school districts and over a dozen other parks and recreation departments in the state have enacted IPM programs.

New York

In January of 2019, New York State Senator Brad Hoylman (27th District) sponsored a bill in the New York State Senate that would prohibit the sale and distribution of products containing glyphosateUpdates on the legislation can be found here.

In July of 2020, New York passed a bill banning the use of glyphosate on all state property. Governor Cuomo signed the legislation in late 2020. The law took effect on December 31, 2021.

North Carolina

  • Carrboro, North Carolina – The city of Carrboro has restricted glyphosate use since 1999. Under the terms of the ban, glyphosate cannot be sprayed in public parks, schools and town buildings or properties. The city will only allow glyphosate to be sprayed under limited circumstances.

Ohio

  • Cuyahoga County, Ohio – Local ordinance prohibits the use of pesticides on county-owned land, and established the adoption of an Integrated Pest Management program for county-owned properties.
  • South Euclid, Ohio – Passed ordinance prohibiting toxic pesticides on public grounds in favor of alternative, organic pest control methods unless permitted by an Environmental Review Board.

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Texas

Vermont

Multiple bills containing restrictions or bans on glyphosate have been introduced in the legislature. Representative Mari Cordes introduced H. 301, which would ban the sale, use or application of the herbicide glyphosate, and Representative Annmarie Christensen introduced H. 328, an act relating to the use of glyphosate herbicide.

Neither bill advanced out of committee.

Virginia

  • Charlottesville, Virginia – Restricts the use of glyphosate on any city-owned parks, schools, or buildings. Glyphosate can only be sprayed under limited circumstances.

Washington

Do you know of a glyphosate ban that is not on our list? Contact us today and let us know.

Get Started
Call (310) 207-3233 or fill out the form below and request a free consultation.
20,000+ Families Represented

"Wisner Baum gave exceptional attention to all aspects of the case, detailed inquiry, and tenacious overview of all the information submitted. The paralegals are efficient and diligent. I was completely surprised to find an empathic personal message to take care of my own health during the challenging time of being a full-time caretaker.*"

Mary Flores
Reviewed
on Google
Read More Reviews
Case Results
We Demand Accountability.
More Successful Results
$2.0 Billion Verdict
Personal Injury
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case. The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case. The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
Continue Reading
$2.0 Billion Verdict
Personal Injury

In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case.

The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.

$289.2 Million Verdict
Personal Injury
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million. Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million. Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
Continue Reading
$289.2 Million Verdict
Personal Injury

$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial

Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million.

Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.

$265 Million Settlement
Fatal Train Crash
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
Continue Reading
$265 Million Settlement
Fatal Train Crash

In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.

When companies choose profit over people, we fight. Wisner Baum exposes injustice, demands accountability, and delivers real results for real people. Your Path to Justice Starts Here.
Los Angeles
11111 Santa Monica
Blvd Suite 1750
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Get Directions
Bay Area
100 Drakes Landing Road
Suite 160
Greenbrae, CA 94904
Get Directions
Washington, D.C.
2101 L St NW 

Suite 800
Washington, DC 20037
Get Directions
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute a client relationship.
Send Us Your Case Details
We’ll respond and let you know the best way to proceed with your case.
crossarrow-up linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram