Glyphosate-Based Herbicide Study Shows Multiple Ingredients are Toxic

​Scientists studying the toxic effects of glyphosate, 14 herbicides (including Roundup) that contain glyphosate, and several other chemicals (called “formulants” or “adjuvants”) also present in herbicides, have produced compelling evidence that glyphosate formulations are more toxic than glyphosate in isolation. Their findings lead to an unavoidable conclusion: regulatory agencies, which have approved glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH) primarily based on studies of glyphosate alone, have not properly scrutinized glyphosate formulations as they are used by consumers.

Glyphosate is Only One Ingredient Among Many in Herbicides Like Roundup

The researchers, Professor Gilles-Eric Séralini from the University of Caen Normandy, France, and his colleagues, Dr. Nicolas Defarge and Dr. Joël Spiroux, first tested glyphosate alone, on both plants and human cells, diluted to percentages that are recommended for agricultural use. They report, “No observable adverse effect was measured.”

In a second test, tomato plants were watered and sprayed for 7 days under the following exposure conditions:

  • Water only (control)
  • Glyphosate alone
  • POEA, polyethoxylated tallowamine, a surfactant. Surfactants are additional ingredients that help the herbicide cling to the leaf and increase herbicide leaf penetration.
  • Glycophan, a GBH, tested at recommended agricultural dilutions (RAD)
  • Roundup GT, a GBH, tested at RAD
  • Roundup Weathermax, a GBH, tested at RAD

Photos of the plants, which can be seen online on page 4 of the study, tell the story. Seralini and his team found that most of the toxic effects occurred during the first 5 days. Over the first 5 days, glyphosate alone “did not show any herbicidal activity.” The three GBH formulations, however, all showed clear toxic effects. As the photos suggest, the formulation POEA was highly herbicidal within three days of exposure.

“After 7 days, G [glyphosate] alone began to desiccate and to whiten a few upper leaves, only starting to demonstrate minor herbicidal effects, while plants had already been killed by all the other treatments except water (control C).”

Testing on human embryonic kidney cells produced similar results. The cells were killed by GBH formulations within 90 minutes, while glyphosate alone did not demonstrate similar toxicity. The authors report that the GBH formulations were thousands of times more toxic to the cells than glyphosate alone.

POEA demonstrated the same toxicity as the glyphosate-based herbicides. In fact, the researchers stated that the POEA formulantion was 3,450 times more toxic than glyphosate alone. They believe that POEA may be “the real principal of toxicity” in the herbicide formulations that contain it.

The researchers also studied very low levels of exposure to the glyphosate formulations, formulants, and glyphosate alone. Even at levels that were not obviously toxic to the cells, all of the exposures produced endocrine disruption.

The study produced one other surprising finding: researchers found the heavy metals arsenic, chromium, cobalt, lead, and nickel – all known to be toxic and endocrine disruptors – in 22 pesticides, including 11 glyphosate-based pesticides. (Herbicides are included in the pesticide category.)

Glyphosate-Based Herbicide Study Shows Cancer-Linked Chemical May Be the Least of Our Worries

The results of this testing, according to Seralini and his colleagues, indicate that glyphosate may be the least toxic substance in most glyphosate-based herbicides. This raises a serious problem, because it is testing on glyphosate that is used by regulatory agencies to determine acceptable levels of exposure to GBH formulations such as Roundup. Surfactants and other formulants, if they are known (manufacturers are not required to identify the inert ingredients in their pesticides) are not tested for long-term health effects.

The authors of this glyphosate-based herbicide study make two important recommendations:

  1. Regulatory experiments to determine acceptable daily intake of herbicides should be performed with the “full formulations and all components” of the herbicides being assessed.
  2. The same full formulations and components should be declared and measured to identify all the active ingredients in the herbicides.

Summary Information

Title
Toxicity of formulants and heavy metals in glyphosate-based herbicides and other pesticides

Authors
N. Defarge1, J. Spiroux de Vendômois2, G. E. Séralini1

  1. University of Caen Normandy, Department of Biology and Network on Risks, Quality and Sustainable Environment MRSH, Esplanade de la Paix, 14032 Caen Cedex, France
  2. CRIIGEN, 81 Rue Monceau, 75008 Paris, FranceNetwork on Risks, Quality and Sustainable Environment MRSH, University of Caen Normandy, Esplanade de la Paix, CS 14032, Caen Cedex 5, France

Journal
Toxicology Reports, 5 (2018), 156-163. Available online December 30, 2017

Funding
This work was supported by the University of Caen and the Committee of Research and Independent Information on Genetic Engineering (CRIIGEN). It received funding from Alibio Institute and Ekibio Foundation, the Regional Council Ile de France, the Regional Council Rhône-Alpes, JMG Foundation, Foundation Lea Nature, Nature Vivante, Malongo, and the Sustainable Food Alliance. The authors wish to thank the European Deputy Michèle Rivasi for the support to accomplish this work.

Contact Wisner Baum today to get started with our team.

Get Started
Call (310) 207-3233 or fill out the form below and request a free consultation.
20,000+ Families Represented

"Wisner Baum gave exceptional attention to all aspects of the case, detailed inquiry, and tenacious overview of all the information submitted. The paralegals are efficient and diligent. I was completely surprised to find an empathic personal message to take care of my own health during the challenging time of being a full-time caretaker.*"

Mary Flores
Reviewed
on Google
Read More Reviews
Case Results
We Demand Accountability.
More Successful Results
$2.0 Billion Verdict
Personal Injury
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case. The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case. The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
Continue Reading
$2.0 Billion Verdict
Personal Injury

In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case.

The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.

$289.2 Million Verdict
Personal Injury
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million. Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million. Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
Continue Reading
$289.2 Million Verdict
Personal Injury

$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial

Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million.

Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.

$265 Million Settlement
Fatal Train Crash
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
Continue Reading
$265 Million Settlement
Fatal Train Crash

In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.

When companies choose profit over people, we fight. Wisner Baum exposes injustice, demands accountability, and delivers real results for real people. Your Path to Justice Starts Here.
Los Angeles
11111 Santa Monica
Blvd Suite 1750
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Get Directions
Bay Area
100 Drakes Landing Road
Suite 160
Greenbrae, CA 9490412
Get Directions
Washington, D.C.
2101 L St NW 

Suite 800
Washington, DC 20037
Get Directions
Los Angeles
11111 Santa Monica
Blvd Suite 1750
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Get Directions
Bay Area
100 Drakes Landing Road
Suite 160
Greenbrae, CA 9490412
Get Directions
Washington, D.C.
2101 L St NW 

Suite 800
Washington, DC 20037
Get Directions
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute a client relationship.
Send Us Your Case Details
We’ll respond and let you know the best way to proceed with your case.
crossarrow-up linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram