No Fees Unless We Win
(310) 207-3233
Menu

Securities Fraud Attorneys

Representing Whistleblowers in Securities Fraud Claims

Securities fraud is a type of white-collar crime in which a person or a business provides false or misleading information used in purchasing or selling investments. It can also be committed by individuals who engage in insider trading. Often complex and multifaceted, securities fraud schemes are most commonly designed to provide misinformation in the name of increasing profits. It is estimated that civil securities fraud costs as much as $40 billion annually.

Those involved in securities fraud can be corporations, stockbrokers, brokerage firms, investment banks, stock analysts or private investors. Corporate officers and/or board members may commit securities fraud by making misstatements on financial reports or in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings, engage in insider trading, falsely represent themselves to corporate auditors or manipulate stock prices.

Securities fraud can have a devastating impact on the financial markets and the world economy. Fraudulent mortgage backed securities, in which multiple home loans are bundled together and sold as a security, played a major role in the 2008 financial crisis. All of the nation’s top investment banks (Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan, Bank of America, Citigroup) sold mortgage backed securities or related financial products whose performance depended on these securities without warning investors of the considerable risk involved. Some of the most egregious offenders paid billions of dollars in fines and penalties for their deceptive practices.

At Wisner Baum, our whistleblower attorneys can represent you in securities fraud claims. We serve clients in California and nationwide.

Types of Securities Fraud

Securities fraud encompasses a wide range of fraudulent activity carried out by individuals and companies alike. The following are common forms of SEC fraud:

Ponzi Schemes

A fraudulent investment fund that pays investors with their own money or money that is obtained from other investors rather than profits made through investments. Bernie Madoff was the operator of a Ponzi scheme that cost investors an estimated $64.8 billion in losses.

Accounting Fraud

This type of financial fraud occurs when accounting firms do not identify falsified financial records. This misinformation can impact financial markets in a number of different ways. In some cases, accountants assist their customers in falsifying their books and records using improper investment deductions or secreting income in a variety of ways. Many of the nation’s largest accounting firms have admitted to or have been charged with negligence or willful misconduct due to their failure to disclose false information related to their client companies’ financial standing. Accounting fraud results in billions of dollars of lost tax revenue, as well as losses to individuals who were deceived about a company’s financial strength. “Cooking the books,” as it is often called, may be used to artificially boost a company’s stock price. In two notable examples, AgFeed Industries, an animal feed and hog production company, created fake invoices to inflate its revenue, Diamond Foods, a snack food company, lied about walnut costs so it could report higher earnings. In both cases, the goal was to make the company look more attractive to investors.

Insider Trading

The trading of a company’s stock, bonds or other securities by company insiders or related parties using information that is not accessible to the public. If a company issues non-public information to any person, the SEC Fair Disclosure regulations requires the company to make that information available to the public.

Securities Fraud Whistleblowers

Whistleblowers report securities fraud directly to the SEC, a federal enforcement and regulatory agency. Anyone with original information pertaining to a violation of securities law can be a whistleblower, provided they are not members, officers or employees of regulatory agencies, law enforcement agencies, the U.S. Department of Justice or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

Individuals who file SEC whistleblower complaints may do so anonymously. The confidentiality provided to SEC whistleblowers is considered the strongest of all federal whistleblower programs. While all whistleblowers are advised to be represented by a skilled whistleblower attorney, those that choose to file anonymously are required to be represented by counsel.

SEC whistleblowers are eligible to receive between 10 and 30 percent of any money recovered from successful enforcement actions exceeding $1 million in sanctions. Whistleblowers are also protected from corporate retaliation, including termination, harassment, suspension, demotion or any kind of threats. Whistleblowers can file a civil suit to seek damages for any retaliatory action taken against them. If successful, compensation may include two times the whistleblower’s actual lost pay, reinstatement and payment of any legal fees.

Awards for Securities and Commodities Whistleblowers

The laws for securities and commodities whistleblowers share some similarities with the False Claims Act. Securities and commodities whistleblowers who provide original information to the SEC or the CFTC that enables the government to collect more than $1 million in an enforcement action are entitled to a reward of at least 10 percent, and potentially up to 30 percent, of the amount recovered.

SEC and CFTC whistleblower rewards are determined by the following:

  • The importance of the whistleblower’s information to the success of the recovery action.
  • The “degree of assistance” provided by the whistleblower and his or her attorneys.
  • The “programmatic interest of the Commission in deterring violations of the securities laws.”

Both the SEC and the CFTC further clarified the meaning of programmatic interest in final rules explaining how their whistleblower programs would be implemented.

In deciding programmatic interest, both commissions consider:

  • The degree to which the award enhances the Commission’s ability to enforce securities laws and protects investors.
  • The degree to which the award encourages other whistleblowers to come forward with high quality information.
  • The severity and wide spread nature of the violations exposed and the potential harm they posed to investors.

Other factors the Commissions consider in determining the size of an award are the timeliness of the whistleblower’s report and any “unique hardships” experienced by the whistleblowers as a result of their reporting and assistance.

To qualify for an award, securities and commodities whistleblowers must provide the SEC or CFTC with “original information,” which is defined in the law as information that “is derived from the independent knowledge or analysis” of the whistleblower and “is not known to the Commission from any other source, unless the whistleblower is the original source of the information.”

A number of other conditions explained in SEC and CFTC rules determine whether information will be considered original. For example, information obtained by an “officer, director, trustee, or partner of an entity… in connection with the entity’s processes for identifying, reporting, and addressing possible violations of law” would not be considered original.

If you have personal knowledge of federal securities law violations and would like to learn more about your options, please contact us.

Get Started
Call (310) 207-3233 or fill out the form below and request a free consultation.
20,000+ Families Represented

"Wisner Baum gave exceptional attention to all aspects of the case, detailed inquiry, and tenacious overview of all the information submitted. The paralegals are efficient and diligent. I was completely surprised to find an empathic personal message to take care of my own health during the challenging time of being a full-time caretaker.*"

Mary Flores
Reviewed
on Google
Read More Reviews
Case Results
We Demand Accountability.
More Successful Results
$2.0 Billion Verdict
Personal Injury
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case. The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case. The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
Continue Reading
$2.0 Billion Verdict
Personal Injury

In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case.

The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.

$289.2 Million Verdict
Personal Injury
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million. Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million. Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
Continue Reading
$289.2 Million Verdict
Personal Injury

$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial

Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million.

Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.

$265 Million Settlement
Fatal Train Crash
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
Continue Reading
$265 Million Settlement
Fatal Train Crash

In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.

When companies choose profit over people, we fight. Wisner Baum exposes injustice, demands accountability, and delivers real results for real people. Your Path to Justice Starts Here.
Los Angeles
11111 Santa Monica
Blvd Suite 1750
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Get Directions
Bay Area
100 Drakes Landing Road
Suite 160
Greenbrae, CA 94904
Get Directions
Washington, D.C.
2101 L St NW 

Suite 800
Washington, DC 20037
Get Directions
Los Angeles
11111 Santa Monica
Blvd Suite 1750
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Get Directions
Bay Area
100 Drakes Landing Road
Suite 160
Greenbrae, CA 94904
Get Directions
Washington, D.C.
2101 L St NW 

Suite 800
Washington, DC 20037
Get Directions
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute a client relationship.
Send Us Your Case Details
We’ll respond and let you know the best way to proceed with your case.
crossarrow-up linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram