Armored trucks and armored cars transport money and other valuable assets for countless businesses. With such an emphasis on safety, security, and protection, you might think armored truck companies spare no expense in maintaining vehicles in their fleet or hiring only the most professional drivers in their employ. Unfortunately, some trucking companies cut corners when it comes to safety, opening the door to catastrophic accidents.
When an armored truck accident happens, victims face numerous challenges: How will I pay my medical bills? What if I have to miss work for an extended time? Will this affect my insurance coverage? Can I get compensation for my damaged car?
Truck Accident Law Firm with Proven Track Record
If you are an accident victim facing such questions, you need a truck accident lawyer with experience litigating cases against armored truck companies. The truck accident attorneys at Wisner Baum have decades of experience advocating for victims of car and truck crashes in Los Angeles, across California, and all over the United States. Our legal team includes board-certified attorneys with a track record of success against many of the nation’s leading trucking companies. With more than $4 billion in verdicts and settlements won for our clients, we know what it takes to win big cases against big companies, including Garda.
Our firm successfully represented armored truck accident victim Gloria “Gigi” Day in a lawsuit against Garda. Mrs. Day sustained severe injuries when a Garda truck lost control and crashed into her Subaru Outback head-on. She suffered several broken bones and endured multiple surgeries before she was able to regain the use of her legs.
An armored Garda truck caused a head-on crash when it swerved into Gloria Day’s lane Nov. 26, 2008. Her Subaru compressed to the size of VW bug. Rescuers said they didn’t believe anyone could have survived.
After months of legal proceedings, the armored truck accident attorneys at Wisner Baum successfully negotiated a confidential settlement on Mrs. Day’s behalf. Her settlement aided in her recovery from the accident and allowed her to pursue the best possible care after such a traumatic event.
On November 26, 2008 my life changed radically. The impact of a 13 ton armored truck on my car with me in it rearranged my lifestyle forever after. It also created ultimate concern for my family of how to make my life more comfortable from there on out.
In February 2009 she was able to begin learning to walk with a walker, then in August, 2009, Gloria presided over the 42nd Fiesta Days as Honorary Mayor.
In the midst of this concern, my family received information from Wisner Baum offering guidance and help. And from that point on that was exactly what we got...guidance and help. In the months that followed the tragic accident, through the long hospitalization, the tedious recovery, and after four months, my triumphant homecoming, they were there offering support and fighting with the insurance company for my benefit. Is it possible to become friends with your attorneys? A very decided "yes." When I finally was able to WALK into their offices for a consultation, the admiration and warmth displayed by that bank of attorneys was very much in the realm of friendship.
Finally, the settlement was received, and my "case" was concluded. But through the follow-ups, there was always that sincere concern for my well-being. And even though they are no longer my "legal team," I know that they are still ready to go to bat for me when needed.
Sincerely, Gigi Day, Frazier Park, CA
Our truck accident case accomplishments include:
$20 million commercial vehicle jury verdict
$15 million tractor-trailer pedestrian accident settlement
$8.5 million semi-truck accident verdict
$6.9 million truck accident settlement during trial against a major truck company
$6 million truck accident settlement
75 truck crash lawsuits settled for $1 million or more
For a free and fast armored truck accident case evaluation, contact usor give us a call today at (310) 207-3233.
Causes of Armored Car and Truck Crashes
Armored trucks require specialized training and skills to operate safely. Why? For starters, trucks are much heavier than passenger vehicles, so they need more time to stop when compared to a car driving at the same pre-braking speed. Additionally, armored trucks typically use air brakes, which have a delayed response following pedal depression not found in cars. Armored trucks also have reduced visibility and line of sight when compared to passenger vehicles.
Some armored truck crashes involve a driver who is untrained or unprepared to deal with the challenges of driving an armored vehicle. In other cases, the armored vehicle is in such disrepair due to maintenance failures that an accident may be impossible for even the savviest driver to avoid. An armored vehicle accident may involve both driver error and mechanical failures.
Whatever the crash cause, armored trucks pose more of a risk of causing serious personal injury, wrongful death, or property damage when compared to a collision involving a passenger vehicle, even when the impact seems less severe to the untrained eye. The differences between a truck accident and a car accident highlight the importance of retaining legal counsel with experience investigating and litigating truck accident lawsuits, which are more complex. Our firm has decades of experience litigating truck cases involving:
Armored truck companies like Garda, Brinks, and Loomis are responsible for hiring and training drivers to operate their vehicles safely. They are likewise responsible for maintaining trucks that meet federal, state, local and industry safety standards. Suppose an armored truck company or one of its employees fails to meet these standards by driving inattentively or cutting maintenance corners. In that case, the truck company may be held responsible for any damage an accident causes.
Some examples of liability in an armored truck crash include:
An armored truck company knowingly hires a driver with a history of reckless and dangerous driving. In this case, the company and the driver may be liable.
An armored truck company fails to inspect its vehicle before a catastrophic mechanical failure. In this case, the company may be liable.
Brink’s Armored Truck Accident
The Brink’s Company, headquartered in Virginia, is the nation’s largest armored car and truck company. Together with Garda and Loomis, the three corporations account for more than 90% of all armored car and truck services in the United States.
Operations worldwide include more than 1,000 facilities and 13,300 cars and trucks. In 2018, Brinks acquired a leading competitor, Dunbar, for $520 million. At the time, Dunbar was the fourth largest armored truck company in the U.S.
The latest crash statistics for Brinks shows its truck have been involved in 141 crashes. In December of 2020, a Brinks armored truck and a passenger car collided outside of Carthage, North Carolina, killing a woman driving the car and injuring the Brinks truck driver.
When a heavy truck collides with a passenger vehicle, the car occupants often suffer severe injuries or are killed.
Brink’s Armored Truck Statistics
Below we profile Brinks FMCSA safety and Out-of-Service % (OOS) ratings against the national average, along with crash data. A satisfactory rating means the company may have functional and adequate safety management controls to meet minimum safety fitness standards.
GardaWorld is a private security firm headquartered in Canada. The company is one of the largest armored car and truck companies operating in the United States. Garda has nine subsidiaries operating in various parts of the country:
Garda CL Atlantic Inc.
Garda CL Central Inc.
Garda CL East Inc.
Garda CL Great Lakes Inc.
Garda CL New England Inc.
Garda CL Northwest Inc.
Garda CL Southeast Inc.
Garda CL Southwest Inc.
Garda CL West Inc.
In 2020, the Tampa Bay Times published an exhaustive investigation highlighting years of Garda accidents that could have been prevented. According to the report, since 2008, 19 people have died in accidents involving Garda armored trucks. Twelve of those accidents were caused by either mechanical issues (brake and steering problems in particular) or driver error in which fatigue may have played a role.
The investigative report noted that upper management at Garda was aware of safety issues with the companies armored trucks but allowed the trucks to continue operating without intervention.
In 2018, a truck accident lawsuit against Garda sought $100 million in damages after one of the company’s trucks crashed into a motorcyclist. The Garda lawsuit alleged the truck driver made an illegal left turn before striking and killing the motorcyclist.
Garda Armored Truck Statistics
According to government data, Garda operates a fleet of nearly 2,000 armored cars and trucks, and employs over 3,000 drivers in the U.S. In a recent 24-month period, Garda armored trucks were involved in 103 crashes, including 60 that resulted in injury and four that resulted in death.
Below we profile each Garda subsidiary’s FMCSA safety and Out of Service % (OOS) ratings against the national average along with crash data. A satisfactory rating means the company may have functional and adequate safety management controls to meet minimum safety fitness standards. A conditional rating means the company does not have adequate safety management controls in place to ensure compliance with the safety fitness standard.
Loomis is a cash handling company based in Sweden that operates in Europe and the United States. The ‘Cash in Transit’ armored car and truck side of the business accounts for roughly 61% of Loomis’ 2020 revenue. Loomis armored trucks transport cash to and from banks, stores, and automatic teller machines (ATMs). Among other things, Loomis collects daily receipts and supplies retailers and banks with change and currency.
In December of 2017, a Loomis truck driver reportedly disregarded a traffic light and struck a passenger vehicle. The occupant of the car, a Georgia woman, sustained severe injuries in the accident. The woman filed a Loomis truck accident lawsuit, alleging the company’s driver was negligent in operating the vehicle, and Loomis was negligent in hiring, training, and supervising the driver.
In 2020, a Georgia jury awarded the woman over half a million dollars in damages. Both Loomis and the driver admitted fault in the accident.
Loomis Armored Truck Statistics
According to government data, in a recent 24-month period, Loomis armored trucks were involved in 91 accidents, including 37 resulting in injury and two resulting in death.
Below we profile Loomis FMCSA safety and Out-of-Service % (OOS) ratings against the national average, along with crash data. A satisfactory rating means the company may have functional and adequate safety management controls to meet minimum safety fitness standards.
Call Wisner Baumat (310) 207-3233to schedule a free consultation.
Get Started
Call (310) 207-3233 or fill out the form below and request a free consultation.
20,000+ Families Represented
"Wisner Baum gave exceptional attention to all aspects of the case, detailed inquiry, and tenacious overview of all the information submitted. The paralegals are efficient and diligent. I was completely surprised to find an empathic personal message to take care of my own health during the challenging time of being a full-time caretaker.*"
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case.
The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case.
The judge later reduced their award to $87M. Monsanto appealed the Pilliod’s verdict which the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District denied on August 9, 2021. Monsanto then requested the California Supreme Court review the appeal’s court decision, which the court denied on Nov. 17, 2021. Monsanto (Bayer) then submitted a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court which SCOTUS denied on June 27, 2022, allowing the final judgment of $87M to remain intact.
In May of 2019, the jury in the case of Pilliod et al. v, Monsanto Company ordered the agrochemical giant to pay $2.055 billion in damages to the plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, a Bay Area couple in their 70s. R. Brent Wisner served as co-lead trial attorney for the Pilliods, delivering the opening and closing statements and cross-examining several of Monsanto’s experts. Wisner Baum managing shareholder, Michael Baum and attorney Pedram Esfandiary also served on the trial team in the Pilliod case.
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial
Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million.
Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial
Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million.
Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
$289.2 million jury verdict in Monsanto Roundup trial
Wisner Baum co-represented Dewayne “Lee” Johnson in the first Roundup cancer lawsuit to proceed to trial. On Aug. 10, 2018, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $39.25 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages to Mr. Johnson, a former groundskeeper who alleged exposure to Monsanto’s herbicides caused him to develop terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Months after the jury verdict, the judge overseeing the trial reduced the punitive damages to $39.25 million. Mr. Johnson decided to accept the remittitur, bringing the adjusted amount awarded to Mr. Johnson $78.5 million.
Monsanto (Bayer) appealed the verdict and Johnson cross appealed. On July 20, 2020, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict against Monsanto but reduced Mr. Johnson’s award to $20.5 million. The company chose not to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, ending the litigation.
$265 Million Settlement
Fatal Train Crash
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
In 2016, Wisner Baum attorney Timothy A. Loranger and six other attorneys in the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee were able to secure a $265 million settlement for victims of the 2015 Amtrak 188 derailment in Philadelphia, one of the largest in the U.S. for 2016.
When companies choose profit over people, we fight. Wisner Baum exposes injustice, demands accountability, and delivers real results for real people. Your Path to Justice Starts Here.
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute a client relationship.
Send Us Your Case Details
We’ll respond and let you know the best way to proceed with your case.
